24-03-2026 19:59
William Slosse
Hello everyone,On 23/03/26, I found the following
21-03-2026 15:13
Lepista ZacariasHello everyone, Does any one know of any literatu
24-03-2026 21:37
Elisabeth StöckliBonsoir,Sur bois (tronc) très pourri de conifère
24-03-2026 21:07
Ethan CrensonHello all, A friend collected this asco in a wood
23-03-2026 20:16
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Good eveningI'm unable to identify this Coprotus o
24-03-2026 15:44
Åge OterhalsI hope someone can confirm the name of this collec
20-10-2017 09:23
Garcia SusanaEste otro crecía en el mismo trocito de madera qu
Gliocladium like fungus
Eduard Osieck,
03-04-2020 14:56
A similar hyphomycete but taller (about 0,5 mm), heads whitish and similar conidia were found on an old basidiocarp of an hydnoid Corticiaceae (cf. Fibrodontia).
Could these concern a Gliocladium or Gliocladium-like species?
Thanks in advance for id help,
Eduard
Josep Torres,
03-04-2020 19:05
Re : Gliocladium like fungus
Hola Eduard
Si fuera mio, para empezar a buscar, lo haría por Stilbella.
Encontrarás información si buscas en el siguiente documento:
"A Monograph of Stilbella and some allied Hyphomycetes"
Saludos cordiales
Si fuera mio, para empezar a buscar, lo haría por Stilbella.
Encontrarás información si buscas en el siguiente documento:
"A Monograph of Stilbella and some allied Hyphomycetes"
Saludos cordiales
Eduard Osieck,
03-04-2020 22:15
Re : Gliocladium like fungus
Hi Josep
Thank you for your reaction. The publication concerned (Seifert 1985) lists 9 genera with species that show a positive KOH-reaction. Most of these genera, with the exception of Gliocladium, do not match with my collections (e.g. being non-synnematous). Unfortunately, none of the Gliocladium species described in this publication is fitting. The species concerned may have been described as “Gliocladium-like anamorph” (with the name of the teleomorph).
Cheers, Eduard
Thank you for your reaction. The publication concerned (Seifert 1985) lists 9 genera with species that show a positive KOH-reaction. Most of these genera, with the exception of Gliocladium, do not match with my collections (e.g. being non-synnematous). Unfortunately, none of the Gliocladium species described in this publication is fitting. The species concerned may have been described as “Gliocladium-like anamorph” (with the name of the teleomorph).
Cheers, Eduard




