
18-07-2025 23:03
Hello.Fruitings between 51 and 130 microns in tota

16-07-2025 17:34

Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention

14-07-2025 11:20

Bonjour, Voici une espèce de (?) Hyaloscyphace

16-01-2023 21:31

Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on

14-07-2025 17:55
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de

14-07-2025 11:17
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest

14-07-2025 15:52
Gernot FriebesHi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae

14-07-2025 13:37
Gernot FriebesHi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari

Ascospores: 6.53 - 8.03 x 3.31 - 3.63 µm, hyaline, non-septate, polar drops at each end, one end slightly larger both rounded.
Asci: 8-spored, Unseriate 60 - 75 x 6.85 - 7.55 µm. IKI -
Paraphyses: 10 µm ± above asci, cylindrical rounded tips, tapering up with 2-septa, filled mostly upper sections VB's, some highly refractive, some with granular exudate tips.
Croziers: Not observed.
Excipulum: Small celled subglobose texture.
with many thanks for any ideas


the thick ascus apex, VB+ paraphyses and spores make an impression of a Hymenoscyphus (around H. imberbis).
Viktorie


I could go back and obtain more material as this test exhausted all that I had left.
Thks again

I was hoping this would make Hymenoscyphus rufescens a distinct possibility now. H. imberbis doesn't seem to fit and the excipulum seems different. Is this Hymenoscyphus or Phaeohelotium - different acceptances seen?
With thanks for your further consideration Tony
