17-01-2026 19:35
Arnold BüschlenHallo, ich suche zu Cosmospora aurantiicola Lite
15-01-2026 15:55
Lothar Krieglsteiner
this one is especially interesting for me because
16-01-2026 00:45
Ethan CrensonHi all, On decorticated hardwood from a New York
18-01-2026 12:24
Josep Torres
Hello.An anamorph located on the surface of a thin
08-12-2025 17:37
Lothar Krieglsteiner
20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened
10-01-2026 20:00
Tom SchrierHi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur
13-01-2026 07:28
Danny Newman
Chlorociboria glauca on indet. decorticate logThe
Nitschkia on Prunus Padus.
Mirek Gryc,
08-04-2021 18:28
Small mushrooms but a big problem :)
This is the first species Nitschkia that I researched, so I lack experience.
A rich collection in ascomata so I devoted a large group to find a hair and subiculum. Despite many attempts, unfortunately, I have not found these elements.
Dimensions of spores are the most similar to Nitschkia modesta?
Nitschkia grevillei has a narrower spores.
Nitschkia pezizoidea has the most suitable spore sizes but ascomata not tuberculate.
Spores 1-septate (poorly visible):
(7.1) 7.5 - 9.7 (9.8) × (2.4) 2.5 - 2.9 (3.2) ?m
Q = (2.6) 2.7 - 3.5 (3.6); N = 15
Me = 8.5 × 2.7 ?m; QE = 3.1
9.73 2.80
9.19 2.54
8.83 2.89
8.53 2.91
9.77 2.68
7.29 2.73
7.68 2.81
8.14 2.75
7.47 2.89
9.49 3.21
8.08 2.52
8.30 2.37
9.68 2.84
9.02 2.87
7.06 2.35
greetings
Mirek
Enrique Rubio,
08-04-2021 18:48
Re : Nitschkia on Prunus Padus.
Hi Mirek
I propose you Tympanopsis confertula (= Nitschkia confertula).
I propose you Tympanopsis confertula (= Nitschkia confertula).
Mirek Gryc,
08-04-2021 19:39
Re : Nitschkia on Prunus Padus.
Hi Enrique.
Actually, morphological features and some microscopic very similar but also too much discrepancies to recognize my collection for this species.
First of all, spores should be much wider.
Substrate also inadequate, I have not seen another fungus exchanged as a host.
Unfortunately, I have to check all the features more accurately.
Thank you
Mirek
Actually, morphological features and some microscopic very similar but also too much discrepancies to recognize my collection for this species.
First of all, spores should be much wider.
Substrate also inadequate, I have not seen another fungus exchanged as a host.
Unfortunately, I have to check all the features more accurately.
Thank you
Mirek