Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

20-05-2026 12:57

unknown semi-aquatic objects
Ingo Ibelshäuser Ingo Ibelshäuser

Hello everybody, on decayed hardwood e.g. Quercus

20-05-2026 20:08

pyreno on Fraxinus
Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening,another quite distinctive find from M

20-05-2026 21:49

Lachnum on Juncus
Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this Lachnum on Juncus stems mown last ye

20-05-2026 17:47

Mollisia on Juncus
Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this Mollisia on dead Juncus stems mown l

20-05-2026 18:15

cf Godronia sp.
Moreno Miriam

Hello! I am working on my master's thesis on the d

22-04-2026 20:54

Pyrenopeziza on monocot.
Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to everybody.This Pyrenopeziza grew in moist le

17-05-2026 22:09

Mollisia sp
éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour tous, Je sollicite vos avis pour ce Molli

19-05-2026 19:47

Xylariaceae?
Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Hello dear community,found this species the second

19-05-2026 12:55

Mollisia sps? with minute spores 2.7 -3.5µm.
Hardware Tony Hardware Tony

After checking Gminder and Otto's library I cannot

19-05-2026 10:27

Peziza phlebospora ?
Patrice TANCHAUD

Bonjour, récolte récente sur terre retournée i

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lachnum cf. crystallinum
Andrés Valverde Valera, 30-04-2020 11:47
Andrés Valverde ValeraBonjour, 
Je vous envoie ces images d'un échantillon de Lachnum, trouvé sur une brindille de Corylus, dans une forêt humide des Pyrenées catalanes. 
Coupe 0,8-0,9 mm diamètre. Pied 0,5-0,6 mm d'haut. 
Asques 34,8 – 40,8 x 5,1 – 5,5 µm.
Spores 7,7 – 10 x 1,5-2,7 µm.
Poils avec incrustations, légèrement élargis au sommet, 25,7-28,2 x 2,6-3,3 µm.
Paraphyses terminées en point, 53,7-53,9 x 3,7-3,9 µm.
Je pense en Lachnum crystallinum, mais je ne suis pas sûr du tout.
Merci d'avance pour votre aide, 

Andrés
  • message #62981
  • message #62981
  • message #62981
  • message #62981
  • message #62981
Lothar Krieglsteiner, 30-04-2020 12:01
Lothar Krieglsteiner
Re : Lachnum cf. crystallinum

Hello Andres,


your Lachnum (s.str.) cannot be L. crystallinum (former Dasyscyphella crystallina) because of the hairs that are granulate to the top. Further, this species grows on Quercus only (?).


Which Lachnum you have found is difficult to say, because we for instance do not know if there are croziers at the base of the asci.


As I see, the paraphyses do not contain (many) vacuoles, and there are no crystals on the top of the hairs.


Best, Lothar

Andrés Valverde Valera, 30-04-2020 12:51
Andrés Valverde Valera
Re : Lachnum cf. crystallinum
Hello Lothar, 
Thank you very much for your answer.
I add two more photos, of the squash of the asci. Luckily I think I could have seen some croziers... and a paraphyse with more vacuolar content? 

Best, 
Andrés 

  • message #62983
  • message #62983
Hans-Otto Baral, 30-04-2020 14:11
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Lachnum cf. crystallinum
Hi Andrés

indeed you have a Lachnum species with multiguttulate paraphyses (the vacuolar bodies are very sensitive and disappear upon presure or when mounting in KOH etc.).

I see a slight reddening of the apos on your macro, this is due to the presence of these VB-guttules that easily get oxidated.

The circle around the ascus base shows rather a simple-septate ascus, but it could be hidden behind.

If the hairs would be more capitate I tend to L. pudibundum. Are the hairs really that short?
Andrés Valverde Valera, 30-04-2020 16:20
Andrés Valverde Valera
Re : Lachnum cf. crystallinum
Thank you very much Zotto! 
About the hairs, it's the length that I could measure, from the top of the hair to the most dense and colored part (I can't ruled out that they will continue in this part). I'm going to try to separate these hairs. 

Andrés