Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

18-05-2026 12:43

Sylvie Le Goff

Bonjour à tousPuis je avoir votre aide sur ce que

18-05-2026 10:13

Lieve Deceuninck Lieve Deceuninck

Dear forum members,I identified this as the teleom

17-05-2026 22:09

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour tous, Je sollicite vos avis pour ce Molli

17-05-2026 19:05

Thomas Flammer

I have found this tiny 200 ym cup shaped apothecia

17-05-2026 16:41

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this Lachnum on an old Rubus stem.Fruitbo

05-04-2026 22:46

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

on wood of Ceratonia, Algarve, 3.4.2026.The color

15-05-2026 13:33

Sylvie Le Goff

Bonjour à tousJe serais très reconnaissante enve

16-03-2011 14:31

roman vargas alberto

Hi. I would like some opinion about this Peziza

14-05-2026 05:36

Ethan Crenson

Hi all,  I haven't paid much attention to Lachnu

10-05-2026 23:17

Andreas Gminder Andreas Gminder

Hello,today we found in a moist steep decidous for

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Hyaloscypha on decorticated hardwood
Enrique Rubio, 22-01-2014 19:47
Enrique Rubio

Hi again


I'd like to know your opinion about these small (up to 0.7-0.9 mm) saucer-shaped subhyaline/greyish, minutely hairy ascomata, that grew on decorticated hardwood dragged by a stream.


The asci are IKI negative even after KOH pret., with croziers and the hairs are small and pointed.


I think in a Hyaloscypha species but I don't know a species that fits well with this collection.


Have you some idea?

  • message #27006
  • message #27006
  • message #27006
  • message #27006
  • message #27006
Hans-Otto Baral, 22-01-2014 20:28
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hyaloscypha on decorticated hardwood
If the asci were simple-septate it would be quercicola.

I looked in Huhtinen and there is nothing that matches this

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 22-01-2014 20:29
Enrique Rubio
Re : Hyaloscypha on decorticated hardwood

HI Zotto


But the asci are clearly with croziers...

Hans-Otto Baral, 22-01-2014 21:54
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hyaloscypha on decorticated hardwood
Yes, therefore it is a species not included in Huhtinen's monograph.