18-07-2025 23:03
Josep Torres
Hello.Fruitings between 51 and 130 microns in tota
16-07-2025 17:34
Bernard Declercq
Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention
14-07-2025 11:20
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Voici une espèce de (?) Hyaloscyphace
16-01-2023 21:31
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on
14-07-2025 17:55
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de
14-07-2025 11:17
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest
14-07-2025 15:52
Gernot FriebesHi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae
14-07-2025 13:37
Gernot FriebesHi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari
Encoelioid on Punica granatum
Nihad Omerovic,
21-05-2024 11:33
found on dead, dry, attached (and fallen) twigs of P. granatum, at the end of April.
Spores measurements:
(13.9) 15.8 -17- 18.8 (20.5) × (3.6) 4.2 -4.6- 5.1 (5.2) µm
Q = (3.1) 3.4 -3.7- 4.1 (4.4) ; N = 31
Asci: 147 - 153 µm, IKI negative
Encoelia01-0001.jpg
Encoelia02-0001.jpg
Nihad Omerovic,
21-05-2024 11:35
Encoelia03-0001.jpg
Nihad Omerovic,
21-05-2024 11:37
Re : Encoelioid on Punica granatum
Spores; only few with LBs(?); germinating
0032.pixi-0001.jpg
20240427205715451.pixi-0001.jpg
20240502090733551-0001.jpg
Nihad Omerovic,
21-05-2024 11:38
Re : Encoelioid on Punica granatum
Ascus, IKI reaction
20240430145548550.pixi-0001.jpg
20240430145429124-0001.jpg
Nihad Omerovic,
21-05-2024 11:39
20240430144954493-0001.jpg
20240430145019840-0001.jpg
Andgelo Mombert,
21-05-2024 12:27
Re : Encoelioid on Punica granatum
Hello,
See Rutstroemia punicae.
See Rutstroemia punicae.
Andgelo Mombert,
21-05-2024 12:29
Nihad Omerovic,
21-05-2024 13:46
Re : Encoelioid on Punica granatum
Thank you, Andgelo
yes, I suspected it too, and I already compared it to that species, very similar. One clear difference is IKI reaction - this one is negative. Still not sure...
yes, I suspected it too, and I already compared it to that species, very similar. One clear difference is IKI reaction - this one is negative. Still not sure...
Hans-Otto Baral,
21-05-2024 20:42
Re : Encoelioid on Punica granatum
This is a great collection! You should look for the excipulum and crystals.
It must be Rutstroemia punicae, known only from the type collection.
Are you sure the IKI reaction is negative? Your photo is unclear herein. Good would be to test dead, somewhat immature asci.
Nihad Omerovic,
21-05-2024 23:42
Re : Encoelioid on Punica granatum
New attempt
Very faint reaction and very few asci but it's there
Very faint reaction and very few asci but it's there
20240521225603290-0001.jpg
20240521230021329-0001.jpg
Nihad Omerovic,
21-05-2024 23:46
Re : Encoelioid on Punica granatum
what are these deposits?
20240521220536899-0001.jpg
20240521220634187-0001.jpg
Nihad Omerovic,
21-05-2024 23:49
20240521223431101-0001.jpg
Hans-Otto Baral,
22-05-2024 16:22
Re : Encoelioid on Punica granatum
The reaction is quite distinct, medium deep.
Crystals are unknown to me in the type collection, but here it seems they are oxalate crystals.
What we need now is the ectal excipulum, I can hardly see it on your survey pic.
T. prismatica with long cells as in the type, or else?
Nihad Omerovic,
22-05-2024 17:12
Re : Encoelioid on Punica granatum
I had difficulties to obtain the reaction, I guess my lugol is going bad.
Textura should be "prismatica-porecta" ectal, intricata medulary, which I think it is, but don't have a good picture right now (squishy specimen); I'll try to confirm it in a few days.
Textura should be "prismatica-porecta" ectal, intricata medulary, which I think it is, but don't have a good picture right now (squishy specimen); I'll try to confirm it in a few days.