Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

12-03-2026 19:44

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to everybody.Can you give me any suggestions ab

11-03-2026 17:36

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Je cherche des indices  pour cette réc

12-03-2026 15:45

Åge Oterhals

Dear forum,I found this small discomycete on a ver

05-03-2026 10:07

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello, I found and collected this species growing

08-03-2026 14:05

Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Bonjour à tous,Sur 3 récoltes supposées de H. l

12-03-2026 16:17

Sylvie Le Goff

Bonjour à tousRécolté dans le 22 en France (ré

12-03-2026 14:37

David Wasilewski

These small ascomycota (1-3 mm) ere observed growi

11-03-2026 16:48

Bruno Coué Bruno Coué

Bonjour, je serais heureux d'avoir votre avis sur

09-02-2026 22:01

ruiz Jose

Hola, me paso esta colección en madera de pino, t

11-03-2026 14:14

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I would like to share a collection of Scopinell

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Marc Detollenaere, 16-09-2023 16:21
Marc DetollenaereDuring a walk in a mixed forest , one of my friends found a number of small yellow to orange cups of about 2-3mm on naked soil.
The fruitbodies I took home were still young and contained mostly oval spores without ornementation of 12-12.5x7.5µ, with 2 large guttules. I also found a few spores with prominent crests. The spores he sent me had also high ridges and had the same size.No reaction with Lugol.
The spore size matches with bicucullata but the paraphyses bent over like a cane what is not describe in Van Vooren 2014. Is Aleuria congrex with rather small spores an option?

 Marc
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
François Bartholomeeusen, 17-09-2023 15:48
Re : Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Hi Marc,
Herewith the measurements (without ornamentation) of my three finds of A. cogrex. All measurements were done in water and from mature spores outside the asci!
Best regards,

François

dd. 4/10/2020

(14) 14.8 - 15.8 (16.2) × (8.3) 8.5 - 9.5 (9.7) µm
Q = 1.6 - 1.7 (1.9) ; N = 16
Me = 15.2 × 9.1 µm ; Qe = 1.7

dd. 22/112022

(13.9) 14.5 - 16.1 (16.5) × (7.5) 7.9 - 8.9 (9.1) µm
Q = 1.7 - 1.9 (2.1) ; N = 20
Me = 15.2 × 8.4 µm ; Qe = 1.8

dd. 29/11/2022

15 - 16.9 (17.2) × 7.9 - 8.8 (9.1) µm
Q = (1.8) 1.81 - 2.1 (2.2) ; N = 12
Me = 16.1 × 8.4 µm ; Qe = 1.9

Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 17-09-2023 18:39
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Your collection is partly immature, but the ornamentation visible on the third picture clearly points to A. bicucullata
Marc Detollenaere, 17-09-2023 21:01
Marc Detollenaere
Re : Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Nicolas and Francois,

Thank you very much for your comments

Marc