Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

23-04-2024 13:17

Edouard Evangelisti Edouard Evangelisti

Bonjour à tous, Je viens de récolter ce que je

23-04-2024 15:18

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

... but likely a basidiomycete. I hope it is o.k.

11-01-2022 16:36

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

Hi does anyone have a digital copy of Raitviir A (

22-04-2024 08:54

Rafael Cabral

Bonjour à toutes et tous, Quelqu'un pourrait-il

22-04-2024 20:38

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good afternoon.Does anyone know this anamorph?It g

22-04-2024 11:52

Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová) Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)

Hello,I made a loan of a collection of Microstoma

21-04-2024 14:29

B Shelbourne B Shelbourne

• Genus Brunnipila: Distinct macro and habitat,

19-04-2024 14:28

B Shelbourne B Shelbourne

Cudoniella tenuispora: Distinctive macro and habit

20-04-2024 16:02

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour,On me fait part, pour diffusion d une list

20-04-2024 09:56

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A few apothecia collected on Sunday, April 7

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Pyreno? 130523 779
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 29-05-2023 20:36
Miguel Ãngel Ribes

Good afternoon


Do you know what this "Pyreno" could be? In Acer leaves, surely A. monspeliensis. They are soft black dots, bulging when hydrated, tiny, which occupy the entire width of the leaf, as you can see in the photos. It doesn't look like a classic Pyreno, it probably isn't.


The asci have a curious apical apparatus, very marked, but it is inamyloid. All asci I've seen have that irregular shape on the walls, I assume they're alive, although it looks like they're not. Spores are 2-celled, with 4 large LBs, 2 per cell, and hyaline conical appendages at the ends.


Orienting myself for the spores I have gone to the genera Anisomeridium, Naetrocymbe, Lophiostoma, Vaginatispora, Lophitrema, Pseudocoleophonea and Wettsteinina, but I don't see anything like that.


These are the measurements:


Spores


(15.5) 16.1 - 17.4 (18.3) × (4.1) 4.7 - 5.3 (5.6) µm


Q = (3) 3.1 - 3.6 (4) ; No. = 38


Me = 16.7 × 5 µm; Qe = 3.4


Asci


(60.1) 60.6 - 72 (83.9) × (10.8) 11.8 - 14.5 (15.6) µm


Q = (4.2) 4.4 - 5.7 (6) ; No. = 42


Me = 67.1 × 13.3 µm; Qe = 5.1



Thank you so much.


Miguel Á. Ribes

  • message #76257
  • message #76257
  • message #76257
  • message #76257
  • message #76257
  • message #76257
Bernard Declercq, 29-05-2023 20:54
Bernard Declercq
Re : Pyreno? 130523 779
Hi Miguel,

A photo of the asci would be very helpful here.

Are the asci swimmig in the perithecial centre? I ask this because the asci seem to have a Diaporthe-like apical ring, spores are Diaporthe-like too. So we have perhaps to look for your collection in the Diaporthales/Sordariomycetes instead of the Dothideomycetes.

Regards,

Bernard
Enrique Rubio, 29-05-2023 21:26
Enrique Rubio
Re : Pyreno? 130523 779
Hi Miguel Ángel.
I think, as Bernard, says, you should look at the Diaporthales, the strongly refractive inamyloid apical apparatus and the sharply cut asci indicate this.
Enrique Rubio, 29-05-2023 21:29
Enrique Rubio
Re : Pyreno? 130523 779
I think it is very important that you try to find out what the perithecium looks like by making thin sections of the leaf through it.
Enrique Rubio, 29-05-2023 21:41
Enrique Rubio
Re : Pyreno? 130523 779
Maybe near Plagiostoma bavaricum?
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 30-05-2023 12:42
Miguel Ãngel Ribes
Re : Pyreno? 130523 779
Hi Bernard

The fifth photo shows asci in water, iki and in blue ink.

I think asci are free swimming in the perithecium. I will find in Diaporthales.

Thanks a lot

Miguel Ángel Ribes, 30-05-2023 13:05
Miguel Ãngel Ribes
Re : Pyreno? 130523 779
Hi Enrique

I will try to make sections now in dry-state. In fresh-state (fig. 2, 3) it is very soft and crushes.
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 30-05-2023 13:51
Miguel Ãngel Ribes
Re : Pyreno? 130523 779
Following the keys of these 2 papers I arrive to Plagistoma barriae, but this especies have a rostrum, smaller asci, narrower spores than mine and occurs in USA:

Leaf-inhabiting genera of the Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales. M.V. Sogonov, L.A. Castlebury, A.Y. Rossman, L.C. Mejía and J.F. White. 2008

A systematic account of the genus Plagiostoma (Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales) based on morphology, host-associations, and a four-gene phylogeny. L.C. Mejía, L.A. Castlebury, A.Y. Rossman, M.V. Sogonov and J.F. White, Jr. 2011.

I don't find information about L. bavaricum.

Thank you.
Alain GARDIENNET, 30-05-2023 13:51
Alain GARDIENNET
Re : Pyreno? 130523 779
I'd missed this post. Probably a Plagiostoma cf bavaricum as Enrique suggests. But if you read Monod correctly, you can guess that there could be several distinct species on maple leaves.
In-depth studies should be carried out, as Sogonov, Meijia and Walker have been able to do in certain groups of these Gnomoniaceae.
The situation is similar for species on Euphorbia or Geranium: perhaps an updating needs to be made using molecular biology, by bringing in new species.
Alain
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 31-05-2023 10:34
Miguel Ãngel Ribes
Re : Pyreno? 130523 779
Thank you very much Alain

I see that it is another group in which it is necessary to deepen, including molecular studies. My samples are available to whoever is needed.


I still can't find documentation on Plagiostoma bavaricum beyond the original description of Hypospila bavarica, I would appreciate any documentation on the species.


Thank you.


 
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 31-05-2023 19:16
Miguel Ãngel Ribes
Re : Pyreno? 130523 779
Hi guys

I have made sections from dried material. I am not sure if the structure around de perithecium is vegetal or fungi. Anyway, it is a thin layer of angularis cells. It hasn't a rostrum.

I can try new cuts if these are not clear.

Thanks again.
  • message #76273
  • message #76273
  • message #76273
Enrique Rubio, 01-06-2023 10:27
Enrique Rubio
Re : Pyreno? 130523 779
I understand that this is a very complex task which, in addition to a very fine cross-section, requires that it passes right through the ostiole. In any case, I would not be able to clarify much except to know whether it is central or lateralised. Plagiostoma s. lat. seems to be the correct genus, although Mejía et al. state that 'based on an LSU sequence, this species belongs in the
Gnomoniaceae but it cannot be placed in a genus. As Alain says, more studies would be needed to try to better define this or these species.
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 02-06-2023 22:12
Miguel Ãngel Ribes
Re : Pyreno? 130523 779
OK, thanks a lot Enrique

I am sure this collection, or at least in this state of maduration, has not ostiole.

Yes, I read that this belongs to Gnomoniaceae, but without a genus.

So, another species in folder aff.

Abrazos.
Enrique Rubio, 03-06-2023 20:39
Enrique Rubio
Re : Pyreno? 130523 779
It is very unlikely that perithecia do not have ostioles. It is a different matter if it is very difficult to see them.
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 04-06-2023 10:33
Miguel Ãngel Ribes
Re : Pyreno? 130523 779
Yes, I know, perhaps it was not very mature.
 I will find it again sometime.
Thanks Enrique