03-12-2021 16:37
maurice pelissier
Bonjour trouvé dans les Hautes Pyrénées sur un
02-12-2021 08:10
Viktorie Halasu
Hello,I have here a large Mollisia (approx. 3 mm,
02-12-2021 12:45
Stephen Mifsud
I was revising some past identifications and I wis
29-11-2021 17:39
François BartholomeeusenGood evening to all,After several microscopic exam
02-12-2021 10:29
Joop van der Lee
I am looking for the following documentation:Chala
29-10-2021 20:54
Chris Yeates
Bonsoir tous As part of my study of the fungi occ
Fungi Exsiccati Suecici
Hans-Otto Baral,
16-10-2021 22:11
Does anybody have access to this?
Nannfeldt 1953 in Lundell & Nannfeldt Fungi Exsiccati Suecici, Praesertim Upsalienses 2089
It is cited in Spooner 1987 on p. 428 and is about the correct name for the type species of Lachnellula. Spooner's statement on p. 426 that chrysophthalma is only a synonym of L. suecica in the sense of Karsten, non Persoon, is unclear to me and is perhaps resolved there.
Zotto
Martin Bemmann,
16-10-2021 23:33
Re : Fungi Exsiccati Suecici
Dear Zotto,
this seems to be a herbarium thing. A specimen seems to be in the USDA collection:
A contact address is given in the link.
The Fungi Exsiccati Suecici were published from the numbers 3001 onwards in the "Publications from the Herbarium, University of Uppsala" and from 3301 in the "Thunbergia". I am not aware if the lists for the numbers 1-3000 were published at all in print form.
Best regards
Martin
Martin Bemmann,
16-10-2021 23:42
Re : Fungi Exsiccati Suecici
oh well, they are printed:
Andrew N. Miller,
17-10-2021 00:21
Re : Fungi Exsiccati Suecici
Label images to this exsiccatae on the MyCoPortal will be added soon.
Cheers,
Andy
Cheers,
Andy
Hans-Otto Baral,
17-10-2021 09:37
Re : Fungi Exsiccati Suecici
Thanks a lot! It was my idea that there are printed schedae and possibly some text along with the collection data, otherwise Spooner would not have cited this Lachnellula suecica material by a reference. So I will be looking now and then if this has gone online.
Martin Bemmann,
17-10-2021 09:55
Re : Fungi Exsiccati Suecici
It is this collection by Nannfeldt himself:
Thr UPS database gives no further details, so you have to wait for the label or the schedae.
Only days before this collection labeled L. chrysophtalma was included:
It might have triggered Nannfeldt's review.
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral,
17-10-2021 10:47
Re : Fungi Exsiccati Suecici
Thanks, yes. Finally I wonder how Nannfeldt came to the conclusion that Persoon had a concept different from Karsten. Perhaps he studied a Persoon specimen from Leiden.
Martin Bemmann,
17-10-2021 16:08
Re : Fungi Exsiccati Suecici
This is a label, still without description:
last hope is the printed schedae....