17-09-2025 19:43
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche morte de Mélèze. Les ascospores sphÃ
18-09-2025 16:14
Bernard Declercq
Hello,I am looking for a copy of following paper:H
17-09-2025 10:50
Heather MerryleesHi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif
11-09-2025 16:57
Jason Karakehian
Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is
16-09-2025 12:53
Philippe PELLICIERPézizes de 1-4 mm, brun grisâtres, sur les capsu
03-09-2025 12:44
Enrique Rubio
Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o
15-09-2025 14:40
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Hello.I'm searching for a digital copy of the seco
Nitschkia on Prunus Padus.
Mirek Gryc,
08-04-2021 18:28
Small mushrooms but a big problem :)
This is the first species Nitschkia that I researched, so I lack experience.
A rich collection in ascomata so I devoted a large group to find a hair and subiculum. Despite many attempts, unfortunately, I have not found these elements.
Dimensions of spores are the most similar to Nitschkia modesta?
Nitschkia grevillei has a narrower spores.
Nitschkia pezizoidea has the most suitable spore sizes but ascomata not tuberculate.
Spores 1-septate (poorly visible):
(7.1) 7.5 - 9.7 (9.8) × (2.4) 2.5 - 2.9 (3.2) ?m
Q = (2.6) 2.7 - 3.5 (3.6); N = 15
Me = 8.5 × 2.7 ?m; QE = 3.1
9.73 2.80
9.19 2.54
8.83 2.89
8.53 2.91
9.77 2.68
7.29 2.73
7.68 2.81
8.14 2.75
7.47 2.89
9.49 3.21
8.08 2.52
8.30 2.37
9.68 2.84
9.02 2.87
7.06 2.35
greetings
Mirek
Enrique Rubio,
08-04-2021 18:48
Re : Nitschkia on Prunus Padus.
Hi Mirek
I propose you Tympanopsis confertula (= Nitschkia confertula).
I propose you Tympanopsis confertula (= Nitschkia confertula).
Mirek Gryc,
08-04-2021 19:39
Re : Nitschkia on Prunus Padus.
Hi Enrique.
Actually, morphological features and some microscopic very similar but also too much discrepancies to recognize my collection for this species.
First of all, spores should be much wider.
Substrate also inadequate, I have not seen another fungus exchanged as a host.
Unfortunately, I have to check all the features more accurately.
Thank you
Mirek
Actually, morphological features and some microscopic very similar but also too much discrepancies to recognize my collection for this species.
First of all, spores should be much wider.
Substrate also inadequate, I have not seen another fungus exchanged as a host.
Unfortunately, I have to check all the features more accurately.
Thank you
Mirek