Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

19-03-2026 18:25

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone, On 18/03/26 I found a few

19-03-2026 19:34

Filip Fuljer Filip Fuljer

Hello everyone,a few days ago I collected this str

17-03-2026 10:09

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour, Voici la description rapide d'un petit d

19-03-2026 15:58

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody, I hope for some hints... Macro:

19-03-2026 17:50

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to everybodyThese thiny, blackish pseudothecia

18-03-2026 13:09

Khomenko Igor Khomenko Igor

I recently examined Celtis occidentalis branches

17-03-2026 19:41

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à

18-03-2026 17:22

Katarina Pastircakova

Hi there,I'm looking for the following literature:

19-03-2026 10:56

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10505643

27-02-2026 11:21

Yannick Mourgues Yannick Mourgues

Hi to all. Here is a specie that can may be relat

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Ciboria on Betula catkin
Juuso Äikäs, 14-01-2021 17:39
Last April I found some quite small Ciboria fruitbodies growing from an old Betula catkin. 

On Betula there are at least two species, C. betulae and C. betulicola. The spore size would fit within the lower range of the former one. About the latter one I haven't found much info. 

The spores measure 9.4 - 10.9 × 4.1 - 5.2 microns. Unfortunately I didn't check the sample in IKI/MLZ or check for croziers. Is it still possible to say which one this is?
  • message #67075
  • message #67075
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-01-2021 18:13
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Ciboria on Betula catkin
Quite small means less than 2-3 mm?

The one well-living spore looks to me like binucleate, though I am not sure.

In Fungi Canadenses (see my folder) C. betulicola is 2-8(-10) mm diam. with long stipe, and spores uninucleate.

C. betulae = seminicola has rough spores that are more slender.

So I have no idea.
Juuso Äikäs, 14-01-2021 18:42
Re : Ciboria on Betula catkin
The diameter of the apos was maybe max. 3 mm or so. I attached a pic of the entire catkin to give a better impression of the size. Here's also a couple extra micro pics. I'm not sure, but maybe I have accidentally photographed a crozier?
  • message #67081
Juuso Äikäs, 14-01-2021 18:44
Re : Ciboria on Betula catkin
Crozier?
  • message #67082
Juuso Äikäs, 14-01-2021 18:45
Re : Ciboria on Betula catkin
Spore.
  • message #67084
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-01-2021 20:39
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Ciboria on Betula catkin
Yes, croziers and 2 nuclei. This would fit C. coryli. How certain is Betula?
Juuso Äikäs, 14-01-2021 21:04
Re : Ciboria on Betula catkin
Ah, ok! If I recall correctly, Betula was the only deciduous tree I saw in the near vicinity. But I can't say I'm 100 % sure. The place would be maybe a bit strange for Corylus. I think it was acidic and fairly nutrient-poor.

But I'll have to keep this in mind and later check the place again. Thanks!