
16-07-2025 17:34

Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention

14-07-2025 11:20

Bonjour, Voici une espèce de (?) Hyaloscyphace

16-01-2023 21:31

Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on

14-07-2025 17:55
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de

14-07-2025 11:17
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest

14-07-2025 15:52
Gernot FriebesHi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae

14-07-2025 13:37
Gernot FriebesHi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari
Ciboria on Betula catkin
Juuso Äikäs,
14-01-2021 17:39
On Betula there are at least two species, C. betulae and C. betulicola. The spore size would fit within the lower range of the former one. About the latter one I haven't found much info.
The spores measure 9.4 - 10.9 × 4.1 - 5.2 microns. Unfortunately I didn't check the sample in IKI/MLZ or check for croziers. Is it still possible to say which one this is?
Hans-Otto Baral,
14-01-2021 18:13

Re : Ciboria on Betula catkin
Quite small means less than 2-3 mm?
The one well-living spore looks to me like binucleate, though I am not sure.
In Fungi Canadenses (see my folder) C. betulicola is 2-8(-10) mm diam. with long stipe, and spores uninucleate.
C. betulae = seminicola has rough spores that are more slender.
So I have no idea.
Juuso Äikäs,
14-01-2021 18:42
Hans-Otto Baral,
14-01-2021 20:39

Re : Ciboria on Betula catkin
Yes, croziers and 2 nuclei. This would fit C. coryli. How certain is Betula?
Juuso Äikäs,
14-01-2021 21:04
Re : Ciboria on Betula catkin
Ah, ok! If I recall correctly, Betula was the only deciduous tree I saw in the near vicinity. But I can't say I'm 100 % sure. The place would be maybe a bit strange for Corylus. I think it was acidic and fairly nutrient-poor.
But I'll have to keep this in mind and later check the place again. Thanks!
But I'll have to keep this in mind and later check the place again. Thanks!