10-06-2026 13:41
François Freléchoux
Bonjour à nouveau, Voici une trouvaille d'hier.
10-06-2026 11:53
Steve ClementsBonjour, This disco is abundant on dead stems of
10-06-2026 12:54
Steve ClementsBonjour encore, Pouvez-vous m'aider, s'il vous pl
10-06-2026 10:45
François Freléchoux
Bonjour à nouveau, Encore une détermination qui
08-06-2026 10:16
I don`t have a clou about this fungus,it is not in
10-06-2026 09:24
François Freléchoux
Bonjour, J'imagine que cette détermination ne do
09-06-2026 18:32
Camille MertensSur morceau de roseau immergé 0,5 - 0,7 mm de dia
08-06-2026 17:00
François BartholomeeusenGood day everyone, On June 5 2026, I collected de
07-06-2026 15:10
William Slosse
Hello everyone,On 05-06-26, I found following asco
Ciboria on Betula catkin
Juuso Äikäs,
14-01-2021 17:39
On Betula there are at least two species, C. betulae and C. betulicola. The spore size would fit within the lower range of the former one. About the latter one I haven't found much info.
The spores measure 9.4 - 10.9 × 4.1 - 5.2 microns. Unfortunately I didn't check the sample in IKI/MLZ or check for croziers. Is it still possible to say which one this is?
Hans-Otto Baral,
14-01-2021 18:13
Re : Ciboria on Betula catkin
Quite small means less than 2-3 mm?
The one well-living spore looks to me like binucleate, though I am not sure.
In Fungi Canadenses (see my folder) C. betulicola is 2-8(-10) mm diam. with long stipe, and spores uninucleate.
C. betulae = seminicola has rough spores that are more slender.
So I have no idea.
Juuso Äikäs,
14-01-2021 18:42
Hans-Otto Baral,
14-01-2021 20:39
Re : Ciboria on Betula catkin
Yes, croziers and 2 nuclei. This would fit C. coryli. How certain is Betula?
Juuso Äikäs,
14-01-2021 21:04
Re : Ciboria on Betula catkin
Ah, ok! If I recall correctly, Betula was the only deciduous tree I saw in the near vicinity. But I can't say I'm 100 % sure. The place would be maybe a bit strange for Corylus. I think it was acidic and fairly nutrient-poor.
But I'll have to keep this in mind and later check the place again. Thanks!
But I'll have to keep this in mind and later check the place again. Thanks!




