16-07-2025 17:34
Bernard Declercq
Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention
14-07-2025 11:20
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Voici une espèce de (?) Hyaloscyphace
16-01-2023 21:31
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on
14-07-2025 17:55
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de
14-07-2025 11:17
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest
14-07-2025 15:52
Gernot FriebesHi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae
14-07-2025 13:37
Gernot FriebesHi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari
Rutstroemia ... maritima?
Maria Plekkenpol,
11-01-2021 20:41
Someone on the FB group of Dutch mycology found these Rutstroemia (Lenneke Roozen). She lives on one of our islands and the substrate is Ammophila arenaria.
Spores av 14-17 x 5-7, filled with little droplets, some younger spores (?) with two droplets. Paraphyses filled, septated and with hardly broadened apex.
Asci 140-150 x 9,5-12.5, J+. Clear croziers?? (I read former topics, so I am not sure???)
Amyloid (see photo of "blue" spore)?
But reading the former topics (and finding hardly any further information about R. maritima) I don't know if it is possible to be sure ..... ???
Greetings, Maria
Hans-Otto Baral,
11-01-2021 21:52
Re : Rutstroemia ... maritima?
Clear croziers! Despite the substrates I am reluctant with R. maritima. It will be difficult to find a morphological character to separate this from R. calopus. But you are right, my maritima folder contains both IKI- and IKI+. I fear this matter is far from being solved.
Maria Plekkenpol,
12-01-2021 18:38
Re : Rutstroemia ... maritima?
Hello Zotto,
Thank you for your fast reply! I already feared this hahaha. But: maybe there will be some discovery in the future, whatever the outcome will be.
One last question: R. maritima can not be said, but is it correct to say that it's either R. maritima or R. calopus? Or are there even more candidates?
Thank you, Maria
Thank you for your fast reply! I already feared this hahaha. But: maybe there will be some discovery in the future, whatever the outcome will be.
One last question: R. maritima can not be said, but is it correct to say that it's either R. maritima or R. calopus? Or are there even more candidates?
Thank you, Maria
Hans-Otto Baral,
12-01-2021 20:11
Re : Rutstroemia ... maritima?
There can be more. This is a difficult complex, with various names, some of them only known from DNA isolates because these species are parasites of grasses. The old names need to be epitypified which needs a thorough study.
I must correct myself, Dennis (1964: 52) reported for authentic material of R. maritima an amyloid ascus apex, though with a moderate apical thickening.
The clade Clarireedia is the home of these parasites, so some use that name instead of Rutstroemia.
Maria Plekkenpol,
12-01-2021 20:47
Re : Rutstroemia ... maritima?
Rutstroemia sp it is for now :)!
Better to know that sometimes things are not sure yet, then naming something without a solid base. That's how I see it anyway.
Thank you Zotto!
Better to know that sometimes things are not sure yet, then naming something without a solid base. That's how I see it anyway.
Thank you Zotto!