Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

10-06-2026 13:41

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour à nouveau, Voici une trouvaille d'hier.

09-06-2026 18:32

Camille Mertens

Sur morceau de roseau immergé 0,5 - 0,7 mm de dia

10-06-2026 11:53

Steve Clements

Bonjour, This disco is abundant on dead stems of

10-06-2026 12:54

Steve Clements

Bonjour encore, Pouvez-vous m'aider, s'il vous pl

10-06-2026 10:45

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour à nouveau, Encore une détermination qui

08-06-2026 10:16

Spooren Marco Spooren Marco

I don`t have a clou about this fungus,it is not in

10-06-2026 09:24

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour, J'imagine que cette détermination ne do

08-06-2026 17:00

François Bartholomeeusen

Good day everyone, On June 5 2026, I collected de

07-06-2026 18:18

Mario Schulz

Hello everyone, i found on 31.5 the following Mol

07-06-2026 15:10

William Slosse William Slosse

Hello everyone,On 05-06-26, I found following asco

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Bryoscyphus?
Georges Greiff, 06-01-2021 14:22
Hi All,

I found a whitish species on sandy soil with Bryum capillare and Ceratodon purpureus. I believed it was Bryoscyphus dicrani in the field but the (unliberated) ascospores do not seem to fit that taxon and the paraphyses appear to lack the distinctive vacuolar bodies present in many fresh collections of Bryoscyphus spp. I wonder if it fits Bryoscyphus "rhombispora" nom prov. Baral. I do not have enough good material for a good quantitative analysis but the ascospore dimensions are approx. 17-20 x 8-10, which seems too large. Found in South England.

Any thoughts or resources would be greatly appreciated. I can't seem to find Zotto's image gallery, which I recall has excellent images of Bryoscyphus spp.

Thanks,

Georges
  • message #66867
  • message #66867
  • message #66867
  • message #66867
  • message #66867
Georges Greiff, 06-01-2021 14:25
Re : Bryoscyphus?
Ah, I think it is Mniaecia nivea...
Lothar Krieglsteiner, 06-01-2021 14:47
Lothar Krieglsteiner
Re : Bryoscyphus?
Yes, this seems more likely (or a related form). The paraphyses are not multiguttulate as they should be in Bryoscyphus.
Best, Lothar