Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

17-07-2025 11:55

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

De ayer en bosque de hayas y abetos, en tieraEjemp

16-07-2025 17:34

Bernard Declercq Bernard Declercq

Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention

14-07-2025 11:20

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Voici une espèce de  (?) Hyaloscyphace

15-07-2025 13:27

Angel Pintos Angel Pintos

Hello, does anyone have access to the following ar

16-01-2023 21:31

Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on

14-07-2025 17:55

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de

14-07-2025 11:17

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest

14-07-2025 15:52

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae

14-07-2025 13:37

Gernot Friebes

Hi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari

25-02-2023 18:36

Elisabeth Stöckli

Bonsoir, Trouvé sur un tronc de Salix recouvert

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Glutinoglossum
Malcolm Greaves, 05-12-2020 16:04
Malcolm  GreavesHas anyone had experience of the Glutinoglossum group?
This sticky specimen has spores from 0-7 septate with about 1/3 being 3, 1/3 being 7 and the final third being split between 0,1,2,4,5 and 6. The average length was 74 (59-84). Both the paraphyses on the head and stem were bulbose and septate.
The best fit I can see is G pseudoglutinosum. Does this seem reasonable?
Thanks
Mal
  • message #66334
  • message #66334
  • message #66334
  • message #66334
Sabino Arauzo, 09-12-2020 21:54
Re : Glutinoglossum
Hi Malcolm,

the key in Fedosova et al. 2018 is not useful in all cases.

We have sequenced several collections with predominant 3, 7 or 3-7 septa and all belong to G. glutinosum.

It is almost impossible to distinguish these species without sequencing.

Sabino.
Malcolm Greaves, 10-12-2020 00:52
Malcolm  Greaves
Re : Glutinoglossum
Thanks for that Sabino. A sample is on its way for DNA.
Does that mean you feel the species in the Fedosova work are not real species or that distinguishing features described are not accurate?
Thanks
Mal