Hyaloscypha vitreola? - Forum ASCOFrance

18-07-2025 23:03

Help with some conidia.

Josep Torres

Hello.Fruitings between 51 and 130 microns in tota

17-07-2025 11:55

Una para ID 833

Castillo Joseba

De ayer en bosque de hayas y abetos, en tieraEjemp

16-07-2025 17:34

Sphaerulina cornicola versus Septoria cornina

Bernard Declercq

Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention

14-07-2025 11:20

Une hélotiale sur Sphagnum palustre

Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Voici une espèce de (?) Hyaloscyphace

15-07-2025 13:27

literature request

Angel Pintos

Hello, does anyone have access to the following ar

16-01-2023 21:31

Troposporella fumosum => Troposporella monilipes

Riet van Oosten

Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on

14-07-2025 17:55

Hypoxylon cf ticinense

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de

14-07-2025 11:17

Jackrogersella minutella VS Hypoxylon cohaerens var. microsporum

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest

14-07-2025 15:52

Olla aff. millepunctata (croziers +) on Rubus idaeus

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae

14-07-2025 13:37

Rutstroemia ulmariae(?) on Saxifraga rotundifolia

Gernot Friebes

Hi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »

Hyaloscypha vitreola?

Juuso Äikäs, 17-11-2020 19:11

I found these a few days ago, growing on a thin branch of a deciduous tree (probably Salix caprea, though Betula might also be possible). As a bonus, I also found a single apo of Orbilia vinosa (new species for me).

I've read that H. vitreola prefers to grow on soft, well-rotted wood. This branch however was pretty firm. Could this still fit?

Spore measurements:

(9.9) 9.92 - 14.8 (15.4) × (2.7) 2.9 - 3.3 (3.6) µm
Q = (3) 3.1 - 4.7 (5.8) ; N = 10
Me = 12.7 × 3.1 µm ; Qe = 4.1

Asci: 53.5 - 63.9 × 9.2 - 10.5 µm