Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

23-03-2026 20:16

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good eveningI'm unable to identify this Coprotus o

23-03-2026 13:24

Paul Cannon

Could anyone provide me with a pdf of Auerswald's

20-10-2017 09:23

Garcia Susana

Este otro crecía en el mismo trocito de madera qu

21-03-2026 15:13

Lepista Zacarias

Hello everyone, Does any one know of any literatu

21-03-2026 22:59

Petr Soucek

Good evening, I would appreciate some advice on th

20-03-2026 12:53

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody, In the field, from distance, my

20-03-2026 16:16

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

These 0.5 mm diam. acervuli were breaking through

19-03-2026 19:34

Filip Fuljer Filip Fuljer

Hello everyone,a few days ago I collected this str

19-03-2026 18:25

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone, On 18/03/26 I found a few

17-03-2026 10:09

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour, Voici la description rapide d'un petit d

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Hymenoscyphus sp.
Mirek Gryc, 14-10-2020 07:52
Hi
Last Sunday I found this Hymeoscyphus growing on leaves lying on the muddy ground. multi-species forest, including Populus. Due to time constraints, I only took a few photos. The spores didn't want to release from the ascus so I put the collection in the ripening room. Unfortunately, I moistened too little and the ascomata gently dried up. Further breeding attempts did not give adequate results. However, looking at the photos taken just after the harvest, I came to the conclusion that it may be quite an interesting species. Similar to H. imberbias but certainly not.
The content of paraffins is very weakly refracting light and tends to blend together. Ascus much longer than that of H. Imberbis. A few measured slightly exceeded 100 µm.
The only similar one that I could find in the literature is Phaeohelotium binucleatum. The problem is, I didn't capture the nucleic droplets in the photos. Some spores show something similar to them, but I'm not sure if it's them?

Anyway, I am posting photos hoping for your opinion.

Spores:

(9.5) 10.2 - 11.2 (12.2) × (3.7) 3.8 - 4.1 (4.3) µm
Q = (2.4) 2.7 - 2.8 ; N = 6
Me = 10.9 × 4 µm ; Qe = 2.7

  9.53 4.03
10.78 3.79
12.23 4.32
10.25 3.70
11.25 3.99
11.08 4.14

greetings
Mirek
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
  • message #65382
Lothar Krieglsteiner, 14-10-2020 08:15
Lothar Krieglsteiner
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
Hello Mirek,
without fully comparing the measurements (no time), I see some similiarities with Hymenoscyphus immutabilis.
Best, Lothar
Mirek Gryc, 14-10-2020 08:36
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
Hi Lothar
I didn't know this genre but it seems it will be this genre.
Many thanks
Mirek
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-10-2020 10:20
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
I agree. The apos are probably over 1 mm? H. immutabilis is comparatively large. The paraphysis content is perfect, not at all as refractive as in imberbis. But with IKI it causes a strong red reaction with extruding minute granules.
Mirek Gryc, 14-10-2020 10:26
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
Hi Zotto
The Ascomats were quite small, about 1mm, probably because, as I said, the fruiting bodies were not yet mature enough.
The contents of the paraphyses, exactly as you say :)
Thank you
Mirek