09-06-2026 18:32
Camille MertensSur morceau de roseau immergé 0,5 - 0,7 mm de dia
10-06-2026 12:54
Steve ClementsBonjour encore, Pouvez-vous m'aider, s'il vous pl
10-06-2026 23:08
éric ROMERO
Bonjour tous, Je vous propose un Mollisia trouvé
10-06-2026 21:16
François Freléchoux
Bonsoir,Le dernier du jour, en attendant votre avi
10-06-2026 21:07
François Freléchoux
Toutes les tiges de gentianes jaunes de l'an passÃ
10-06-2026 13:41
François Freléchoux
Bonjour à nouveau, Voici une trouvaille d'hier.
10-06-2026 11:53
Steve ClementsBonjour, This disco is abundant on dead stems of
10-06-2026 10:45
François Freléchoux
Bonjour à nouveau, Encore une détermination qui
08-06-2026 10:16
Spooren Marco
I don`t have a clou about this fungus,it is not in
10-06-2026 09:24
François Freléchoux
Bonjour, J'imagine que cette détermination ne do
Hymenoscyphus sp.
Mirek Gryc,
14-10-2020 07:52
Last Sunday I found this Hymeoscyphus growing on leaves lying on the muddy ground. multi-species forest, including Populus. Due to time constraints, I only took a few photos. The spores didn't want to release from the ascus so I put the collection in the ripening room. Unfortunately, I moistened too little and the ascomata gently dried up. Further breeding attempts did not give adequate results. However, looking at the photos taken just after the harvest, I came to the conclusion that it may be quite an interesting species. Similar to H. imberbias but certainly not.
The content of paraffins is very weakly refracting light and tends to blend together. Ascus much longer than that of H. Imberbis. A few measured slightly exceeded 100 µm.
The only similar one that I could find in the literature is Phaeohelotium binucleatum. The problem is, I didn't capture the nucleic droplets in the photos. Some spores show something similar to them, but I'm not sure if it's them?
Anyway, I am posting photos hoping for your opinion.
Spores:
(9.5) 10.2 - 11.2 (12.2) × (3.7) 3.8 - 4.1 (4.3) µm
Q = (2.4) 2.7 - 2.8 ; N = 6
Me = 10.9 × 4 µm ; Qe = 2.7
Q = (2.4) 2.7 - 2.8 ; N = 6
Me = 10.9 × 4 µm ; Qe = 2.7
 9.53 4.03
10.78 3.79
12.23 4.32
10.25 3.70
11.25 3.99
11.08 4.14
10.78 3.79
12.23 4.32
10.25 3.70
11.25 3.99
11.08 4.14
greetings
Mirek
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
14-10-2020 08:15
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
Hello Mirek,
without fully comparing the measurements (no time), I see some similiarities with Hymenoscyphus immutabilis.
Best, Lothar
without fully comparing the measurements (no time), I see some similiarities with Hymenoscyphus immutabilis.
Best, Lothar
Mirek Gryc,
14-10-2020 08:36
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
Hi Lothar
I didn't know this genre but it seems it will be this genre.
Many thanks
Mirek
I didn't know this genre but it seems it will be this genre.
Many thanks
Mirek
Hans-Otto Baral,
14-10-2020 10:20
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
I agree. The apos are probably over 1 mm? H. immutabilis is comparatively large. The paraphysis content is perfect, not at all as refractive as in imberbis. But with IKI it causes a strong red reaction with extruding minute granules.
Mirek Gryc,
14-10-2020 10:26
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
Hi Zotto
The Ascomats were quite small, about 1mm, probably because, as I said, the fruiting bodies were not yet mature enough.
The contents of the paraphyses, exactly as you say :)
Thank you
Mirek
The Ascomats were quite small, about 1mm, probably because, as I said, the fruiting bodies were not yet mature enough.
The contents of the paraphyses, exactly as you say :)
Thank you
Mirek