
16-07-2025 17:34

Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention

14-07-2025 11:20

Bonjour, Voici une espèce de (?) Hyaloscyphace

16-01-2023 21:31

Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on

14-07-2025 17:55
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de

14-07-2025 11:17
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest

14-07-2025 15:52
Gernot FriebesHi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae

14-07-2025 13:37
Gernot FriebesHi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari
Geoglossum sp.
Vasileios Kaounas,
30-12-2019 09:12
Found in forest with Pinus halepensis, near to Olea.
asci (186.9) 192.9 - 220.1 (235) × (16.6) 19.4 - 21.2 (23.6) µm
spores (103.3) 110.7 - 135.7 (136.2) × (11.6) 12.9 - 13.4 (13.7) µm
Jacky Launoy,
30-12-2019 09:43
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Try Geoglossum fallax. If not look if the ascus is amyloid or hemiamyloid
Luc Lenaerts,
30-12-2019 14:47
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Hi,
I think it's Geoglossum cookeanum, because of the 7-septate spores and the presence of much moniliform chaines in the parafyses. Difference with Geoglossum barlae sensu stricto with rotated, distorted and intertwined paraphyses and almost without clear moniliform chains in the paraphyses is sometimes difficult. In my opinion the spores here are not 110-135 µm long, but much smaller.
Kind regards
Luc Lenaerts
I think it's Geoglossum cookeanum, because of the 7-septate spores and the presence of much moniliform chaines in the parafyses. Difference with Geoglossum barlae sensu stricto with rotated, distorted and intertwined paraphyses and almost without clear moniliform chains in the paraphyses is sometimes difficult. In my opinion the spores here are not 110-135 µm long, but much smaller.
Kind regards
Luc Lenaerts
Sabino Arauzo,
30-12-2019 15:17
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Yes, Geoglossum cookeanum, the spore measures must be wrong.
Sabino.