Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

20-10-2017 09:23

Garcia Susana

Este otro crecía en el mismo trocito de madera qu

20-03-2026 16:16

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

These 0.5 mm diam. acervuli were breaking through

20-03-2026 12:53

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody, In the field, from distance, my

19-03-2026 19:34

Filip Fuljer Filip Fuljer

Hello everyone,a few days ago I collected this str

19-03-2026 18:25

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone, On 18/03/26 I found a few

17-03-2026 10:09

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour, Voici la description rapide d'un petit d

19-03-2026 15:58

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody, I hope for some hints... Macro:

19-03-2026 17:50

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to everybodyThese thiny, blackish pseudothecia

18-03-2026 13:09

Khomenko Igor Khomenko Igor

I recently examined Celtis occidentalis branches

17-03-2026 19:41

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Geoglossum sp.
Vasileios Kaounas, 30-12-2019 09:12
Vasileios Kaounas
Found in forest with Pinus halepensis, near to Olea.

asci (186.9) 192.9 - 220.1 (235) × (16.6) 19.4 - 21.2 (23.6) µm

spores (103.3) 110.7 - 135.7 (136.2) × (11.6) 12.9 - 13.4 (13.7) µm
Jacky Launoy, 30-12-2019 09:43
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Try Geoglossum fallax. If not look if the ascus is amyloid or hemiamyloid
Luc Lenaerts, 30-12-2019 14:47
Luc Lenaerts
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Hi,

I think it's Geoglossum cookeanum, because of the 7-septate spores and the presence of much moniliform chaines in the parafyses. Difference with Geoglossum barlae sensu stricto with rotated, distorted and intertwined paraphyses and almost without clear moniliform chains in the paraphyses is sometimes difficult. In my opinion the spores here are not 110-135 µm long, but much smaller.

Kind regards
Luc Lenaerts
Sabino Arauzo, 30-12-2019 15:17
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Yes, Geoglossum cookeanum, the spore measures must be wrong.

Sabino.
Peter Püwert, 30-12-2019 15:25
Peter Püwert
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Hi,

I agree with Luc and Sabino.

Greetings Peter.
  • message #60698
  • message #60698