Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

17-11-2025 21:46

Lachnum impudicum
Philippe PELLICIER

Bonjour,Récolté sur bois pourrissant de feuillu

18-11-2025 18:26

Literature search
David Malloch David Malloch

I am trying to locate the article, Müller, E. 195

19-11-2025 13:04

Karstenia ? spores acuminées
Bruno Coué Bruno Coué

Bonjour,je  sollicite votre avis pour la récote

16-11-2025 21:09

Hyphomycete on twig of abies
Robin Isaksson Robin Isaksson

Anyone recognize this acc. to pictures.? Found on

18-11-2025 13:59

ID Help Hymenoscyphus
Nogueira Héctor

November 14, 2025 Brazuelo (León) SPAIN Hymenosc

17-11-2025 19:14

Cheilymenia crucipila
herman lambert

Apothécie discoïde 0.6 cm diam., orangeFace hymÃ

17-11-2025 21:57

Hyaloscypha fuckelii var. alniseta
Philippe PELLICIER

Bonjour,Récolté sur bois de feuillu mort dur, no

14-11-2025 16:26

Small species on Cytisus scoparius
Marian Jagers Marian Jagers

Hello everyone, On dead wood of Cytisus scoparius

15-11-2025 23:22

Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus? on Phytolacca
Mario Filippa

Hello,this is what I think to be Hymenoscyphus mac

15-11-2025 20:25

Cryptosphaeria ligniota?
Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde, Nov. 2025

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Otidea tuomikoskii?
Juuso Äikäs, 11-12-2019 23:29
I found these in a Picea abies dominated forest in the middle of October. I measured 15 spores and the results were like this: 11.8-12.8 x 7.7-8.2, Q = 1.5-1.6. A bit larger compared to the info I found on the internet. Still the appearance of the fruitbodies and microscopy looks like it could be O. tuomikoskii and I don't have a better candidate in mind. What do you think?
  • message #60450
  • message #60450
  • message #60450
  • message #60450
Pérez del Amo Carlos Manuel, 12-12-2019 13:27
Pérez del Amo Carlos Manuel
Re : Otidea tuomikoskii?

http://www.ascofrance.fr/search_forum/51266



Saludos,
Carlos
Juuso Äikäs, 12-12-2019 16:47
Re : Otidea tuomikoskii?
Thanks! Seems quite similar to my finding. The spore measurements still cast a doubt for me, especially the width (Q on average 1.5). They are from a fresh spore print in water... maybe that could explain the difference.
  • message #60459
Peter Püwert, 12-12-2019 23:48
Peter Püwert
Re : Otidea tuomikoskii?
Hi, in my opinion isn't O. tuom. The spores size in litt. is 10-11 x 5,5-6,5 by Van VOOREN et al. (2008, 2014, 2015), Carlos 9,5-11 x 5,4-6,7...and I see not different color between outer surface (brownish, distinct furfuraceous) and the hymenial layer (yellowish).

Greetings Peter.
  • message #60465
Andreas Gminder, 13-12-2019 00:12
Andreas Gminder
Re : Otidea tuomikoskii?
Hello,

I second Peter in his opinion that this is not O. tuomikoskii (neither O. papillata which is nearly undistinguishable IMO). Your Otidea seems to have a smooth outer surface and seems to grow single, whereas O. tuomikoskii mostly grows in group and often fasciculate. The shape doesn't suite too well and the unicoloured aopthecia don't look right either, as Peter already mentioned.

all the best,
Andreas
Viktorie Halasu, 14-12-2019 00:07
Viktorie Halasu
Re : Otidea tuomikoskii?
Hello,
did you check the chemical reactions of surface exudates with Melzer + reaction of both exudates and the whole section in KOH? In O. tuomikoskii the whole excipulum turns yellowish in KOH. In the rest of small-spored species the surface exudates (incrustations on surface hyphae) have different reaction in Melzer, changing slowly (in a minute or two) to rounded drops in some species or negative in other. 
Viktorie
Juuso Äikäs, 15-12-2019 15:43
Re : Otidea tuomikoskii?
Thanks for the comments. I didn't check the chemical reactions, but that's good to know. Maybe this is just a boring old O. leporina.