Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

25-01-2026 16:08

Geoglossum
Malcolm Greaves Malcolm Greaves

This Geoglossum had spores mostly 70-80 (87) with

27-01-2026 11:43

DNA match
Malcolm Greaves Malcolm Greaves

Is anyone with experience of DNA testing able to t

26-01-2026 11:49

Anamorph on Cytisus
Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this possible anamorph on a dead Cytisus

25-01-2026 23:23

Delitschia/Lojkania? on wood
Tomaz Vucko Tomaz Vucko

Hello! I found this species that resembles Delitsc

18-01-2026 12:24

Anamorph on an olive tree
Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.An anamorph located on the surface of a thin

23-01-2026 21:50

Looking for a paper please
Cameron DK

I am looking for this please publication. is anyon

10-01-2026 20:00

Lichenicolous fungus on Protoparmeliopsis muralis
Tom Schrier

Hi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur

21-01-2026 19:55

Nemania aureolutea?
Bohan Jia

Hi,  Could this be Nemania aureolutea? Or did I

21-01-2026 16:32

Lichenicolous coelomycete
Gernot Friebes

Hi,I need your help with some black dots on a lich

21-01-2026 16:48

Hyphomycete on Rubus fruticosus agg.
Gernot Friebes

Hi,after my last unknown hyphomycete on this subst

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Otidea tuomikoskii?
Juuso Äikäs, 11-12-2019 23:29
I found these in a Picea abies dominated forest in the middle of October. I measured 15 spores and the results were like this: 11.8-12.8 x 7.7-8.2, Q = 1.5-1.6. A bit larger compared to the info I found on the internet. Still the appearance of the fruitbodies and microscopy looks like it could be O. tuomikoskii and I don't have a better candidate in mind. What do you think?
  • message #60450
  • message #60450
  • message #60450
  • message #60450
Pérez del Amo Carlos Manuel, 12-12-2019 13:27
Pérez del Amo Carlos Manuel
Re : Otidea tuomikoskii?

http://www.ascofrance.fr/search_forum/51266



Saludos,
Carlos
Juuso Äikäs, 12-12-2019 16:47
Re : Otidea tuomikoskii?
Thanks! Seems quite similar to my finding. The spore measurements still cast a doubt for me, especially the width (Q on average 1.5). They are from a fresh spore print in water... maybe that could explain the difference.
  • message #60459
Peter Püwert, 12-12-2019 23:48
Peter Püwert
Re : Otidea tuomikoskii?
Hi, in my opinion isn't O. tuom. The spores size in litt. is 10-11 x 5,5-6,5 by Van VOOREN et al. (2008, 2014, 2015), Carlos 9,5-11 x 5,4-6,7...and I see not different color between outer surface (brownish, distinct furfuraceous) and the hymenial layer (yellowish).

Greetings Peter.
  • message #60465
Andreas Gminder, 13-12-2019 00:12
Andreas Gminder
Re : Otidea tuomikoskii?
Hello,

I second Peter in his opinion that this is not O. tuomikoskii (neither O. papillata which is nearly undistinguishable IMO). Your Otidea seems to have a smooth outer surface and seems to grow single, whereas O. tuomikoskii mostly grows in group and often fasciculate. The shape doesn't suite too well and the unicoloured aopthecia don't look right either, as Peter already mentioned.

all the best,
Andreas
Viktorie Halasu, 14-12-2019 00:07
Viktorie Halasu
Re : Otidea tuomikoskii?
Hello,
did you check the chemical reactions of surface exudates with Melzer + reaction of both exudates and the whole section in KOH? In O. tuomikoskii the whole excipulum turns yellowish in KOH. In the rest of small-spored species the surface exudates (incrustations on surface hyphae) have different reaction in Melzer, changing slowly (in a minute or two) to rounded drops in some species or negative in other. 
Viktorie
Juuso Äikäs, 15-12-2019 15:43
Re : Otidea tuomikoskii?
Thanks for the comments. I didn't check the chemical reactions, but that's good to know. Maybe this is just a boring old O. leporina.