05-02-2026 15:07
Found on a fallen needle of Pinus halepensis, diam
05-02-2026 06:43
Stefan BlaserHello everybody, Any help on this one would be mu
18-08-2025 15:07
Lothar Krieglsteiner
.. 20.7.25, in subarctic habital. The liverwort i
02-02-2026 21:46
Margot en Geert VullingsOn a barkless poplar branch, we found hairy discs
02-02-2026 14:55
Andgelo Mombert
Bonjour,Sur thalle de Lobaria pulmonaria.Conidiome
02-02-2026 14:33
Andgelo Mombert
Bonjour,Sur le thalle de Peltigera praetextata, ne
31-01-2026 10:22
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Cette hypocreale parasite en nombre les
02-02-2026 09:29
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pour cette récolte de 2
Lachnaceae?
Guy Buddy,
08-05-2019 15:44
(8.4) 8.9 - 12.5 (14.1) × (1.5) 1.6 - 2.1 (2.2) µm
Q = (4.6) 4.9 - 6.3 (7.2) ; N = 20; Me = 10.5 × 1.9 µm ; Qe = 5.6
Hair measure:(56.6) 60 - 66.5 (68.7) × 3.5 - 4.8 (5.4) µm
Q = (11.8) 12.4 - 18 (18.3) ; N = 8; Me = 63.7 × 4.2 µm ; Qe = 15.7
Hans-Otto Baral,
08-05-2019 15:57
Re : Lachnaceae?
I am not sure if you mixed something here.
There are almost cylnidrocal spores (living in water) and strongly fusiform ones (in ?CB).
Together with the large spore size I suspect the latter to be Incrucipulum ciliare. But there the hairs are thick-walled and bear crystals, and the living spores would be multiguttulate.
Please, if you have it still fresh, look again in water for the large fusiform spores.
There are almost cylnidrocal spores (living in water) and strongly fusiform ones (in ?CB).
Together with the large spore size I suspect the latter to be Incrucipulum ciliare. But there the hairs are thick-walled and bear crystals, and the living spores would be multiguttulate.
Please, if you have it still fresh, look again in water for the large fusiform spores.
Guy Buddy,
08-05-2019 16:17
Hans-Otto Baral,
08-05-2019 16:27
Re : Lachnaceae?
So they are all eguttulate. What is the length of the scale in the spore photos?
Guy Buddy,
08-05-2019 16:41
Re : Lachnaceae?
Sorry, the bar is 20um
Hans-Otto Baral,
08-05-2019 17:36
Re : Lachnaceae?
Then you must divide your measurements /2. I measure 11-16 x1.8-2.2.
But I cannot recall s species like this, perhaps American.
But I cannot recall s species like this, perhaps American.
Guy Buddy,
08-05-2019 20:18
Re : Lachnaceae?
Hans, you are right. I measured from a 1000x photo while I was thinking it was 400x.
The correct spore measurement is:(8.4) 8.9 - 12.5 (14.1) × (1.5) 1.6 - 2.1 (2.2) µm
Q = (4.6) 4.9 - 6.3 (7.2) ; N = 20; Me = 10.5 × 1.9 µm ; Qe = 5.6
Thank you for acute observation and sharing your expertise!
The correct spore measurement is:(8.4) 8.9 - 12.5 (14.1) × (1.5) 1.6 - 2.1 (2.2) µm
Q = (4.6) 4.9 - 6.3 (7.2) ; N = 20; Me = 10.5 × 1.9 µm ; Qe = 5.6
Thank you for acute observation and sharing your expertise!















