24-04-2024 21:54
éric ROMEROBonjour, J'ai trouvé ce Lasiobolus sur laissées
23-04-2024 15:18
Lothar Krieglsteiner... but likely a basidiomycete. I hope it is o.k.
23-04-2024 13:17
Edouard EvangelistiBonjour à tous, Je viens de récolter ce que je
23-04-2024 21:49
Ethan CrensonHello all, A friend recently found this orange as
22-04-2024 11:52
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)Hello,I made a loan of a collection of Microstoma
11-01-2022 16:36
Jason KarakehianHi does anyone have a digital copy of Raitviir A (
22-04-2024 20:38
Miguel Ángel RibesGood afternoon.Does anyone know this anamorph?It g
19-04-2024 14:28
B ShelbourneCudoniella tenuispora: Distinctive macro and habit
Lachnaceae?
Guy Buddy,
08-05-2019 15:44
(8.4) 8.9 - 12.5 (14.1) × (1.5) 1.6 - 2.1 (2.2) µm
Q = (4.6) 4.9 - 6.3 (7.2) ; N = 20; Me = 10.5 × 1.9 µm ; Qe = 5.6
Hair measure:(56.6) 60 - 66.5 (68.7) × 3.5 - 4.8 (5.4) µm
Q = (11.8) 12.4 - 18 (18.3) ; N = 8; Me = 63.7 × 4.2 µm ; Qe = 15.7
Hans-Otto Baral,
08-05-2019 15:57
Re : Lachnaceae?
I am not sure if you mixed something here.
There are almost cylnidrocal spores (living in water) and strongly fusiform ones (in ?CB).
Together with the large spore size I suspect the latter to be Incrucipulum ciliare. But there the hairs are thick-walled and bear crystals, and the living spores would be multiguttulate.
Please, if you have it still fresh, look again in water for the large fusiform spores.
There are almost cylnidrocal spores (living in water) and strongly fusiform ones (in ?CB).
Together with the large spore size I suspect the latter to be Incrucipulum ciliare. But there the hairs are thick-walled and bear crystals, and the living spores would be multiguttulate.
Please, if you have it still fresh, look again in water for the large fusiform spores.
Guy Buddy,
08-05-2019 16:17
Hans-Otto Baral,
08-05-2019 16:27
Re : Lachnaceae?
So they are all eguttulate. What is the length of the scale in the spore photos?
Guy Buddy,
08-05-2019 16:41
Re : Lachnaceae?
Sorry, the bar is 20um
Hans-Otto Baral,
08-05-2019 17:36
Re : Lachnaceae?
Then you must divide your measurements /2. I measure 11-16 x1.8-2.2.
But I cannot recall s species like this, perhaps American.
But I cannot recall s species like this, perhaps American.
Guy Buddy,
08-05-2019 20:18
Re : Lachnaceae?
Hans, you are right. I measured from a 1000x photo while I was thinking it was 400x.
The correct spore measurement is:(8.4) 8.9 - 12.5 (14.1) × (1.5) 1.6 - 2.1 (2.2) µm
Q = (4.6) 4.9 - 6.3 (7.2) ; N = 20; Me = 10.5 × 1.9 µm ; Qe = 5.6
Thank you for acute observation and sharing your expertise!
The correct spore measurement is:(8.4) 8.9 - 12.5 (14.1) × (1.5) 1.6 - 2.1 (2.2) µm
Q = (4.6) 4.9 - 6.3 (7.2) ; N = 20; Me = 10.5 × 1.9 µm ; Qe = 5.6
Thank you for acute observation and sharing your expertise!