14-09-2025 22:16
Philippe PELLICIERApothécies petites jusquà 3 mm, oranges, avec de
13-09-2025 14:01
Thomas Flammerdark brown apothecia, splitIKI-Spores biguttulate
13-09-2025 14:10
Wim de GrootWe found this hymenoscyphus on rubus fruticulosis.
11-09-2025 16:57
Jason Karakehian
Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is
10-09-2025 23:53
Marcel Heyligen
Found on Robinia pseudoacasia together with Diapor
10-09-2025 17:18
Blasco Rafael
Hola, encontre este estiercol de vaca estos apotec
02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903
Lachnaceae?
Guy Buddy,
08-05-2019 15:44
(8.4) 8.9 - 12.5 (14.1) × (1.5) 1.6 - 2.1 (2.2) µm
Q = (4.6) 4.9 - 6.3 (7.2) ; N = 20; Me = 10.5 × 1.9 µm ; Qe = 5.6
Hair measure:(56.6) 60 - 66.5 (68.7) × 3.5 - 4.8 (5.4) µm
Q = (11.8) 12.4 - 18 (18.3) ; N = 8; Me = 63.7 × 4.2 µm ; Qe = 15.7
Hans-Otto Baral,
08-05-2019 15:57
Re : Lachnaceae?
I am not sure if you mixed something here.
There are almost cylnidrocal spores (living in water) and strongly fusiform ones (in ?CB).
Together with the large spore size I suspect the latter to be Incrucipulum ciliare. But there the hairs are thick-walled and bear crystals, and the living spores would be multiguttulate.
Please, if you have it still fresh, look again in water for the large fusiform spores.
There are almost cylnidrocal spores (living in water) and strongly fusiform ones (in ?CB).
Together with the large spore size I suspect the latter to be Incrucipulum ciliare. But there the hairs are thick-walled and bear crystals, and the living spores would be multiguttulate.
Please, if you have it still fresh, look again in water for the large fusiform spores.
Guy Buddy,
08-05-2019 16:17
Re : Lachnaceae?
Hans
Thanks for the quick response. Attached are some more photos of the spores in H20.
Thanks for the quick response. Attached are some more photos of the spores in H20.
Hans-Otto Baral,
08-05-2019 16:27
Re : Lachnaceae?
So they are all eguttulate. What is the length of the scale in the spore photos?
Guy Buddy,
08-05-2019 16:41
Re : Lachnaceae?
Sorry, the bar is 20um
Hans-Otto Baral,
08-05-2019 17:36
Re : Lachnaceae?
Then you must divide your measurements /2. I measure 11-16 x1.8-2.2.
But I cannot recall s species like this, perhaps American.
But I cannot recall s species like this, perhaps American.
Guy Buddy,
08-05-2019 20:18
Re : Lachnaceae?
Hans, you are right. I measured from a 1000x photo while I was thinking it was 400x.
The correct spore measurement is:(8.4) 8.9 - 12.5 (14.1) × (1.5) 1.6 - 2.1 (2.2) µm
Q = (4.6) 4.9 - 6.3 (7.2) ; N = 20; Me = 10.5 × 1.9 µm ; Qe = 5.6
Thank you for acute observation and sharing your expertise!
The correct spore measurement is:(8.4) 8.9 - 12.5 (14.1) × (1.5) 1.6 - 2.1 (2.2) µm
Q = (4.6) 4.9 - 6.3 (7.2) ; N = 20; Me = 10.5 × 1.9 µm ; Qe = 5.6
Thank you for acute observation and sharing your expertise!