
16-09-2025 12:53
Philippe PELLICIERPézizes de 1-4 mm, brun frisâtres, sur les capsu

03-09-2025 12:44
Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o

15-09-2025 14:40

Hello.I'm searching for a digital copy of the seco

14-09-2025 22:16
Philippe PELLICIERApothécies petites jusquà 3 mm, oranges, avec de

13-09-2025 14:01
Thomas Flammerdark brown apothecia, splitIKI-Spores biguttulate

10-09-2025 17:18

Hola, encontre este estiercol de vaca estos apotec

13-09-2025 14:10
Wim de GrootWe found this hymenoscyphus on rubus fruticulosis.

11-09-2025 16:57
Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is

10-09-2025 23:53

Found on Robinia pseudoacasia together with Diapor

02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903
Sarcoscypha coccinea
Malcolm Greaves,
16-03-2017 16:53
Mal
Hans-Otto Baral,
16-03-2017 17:38

Re : Sarcoscypha coccinea
Yes, it is obviously S. coccinea. Was it this one that became rare in England?
Malcolm Greaves,
16-03-2017 17:56
Re : Sarcoscypha coccinea
Zotto Thanks.
Yes it was the only one in the Phillips book read by the majority of amature mycologists in the 1980/90s and so almost all finds in that era were designated as S coccinea. On the national records database they have a ratio of 340 : 1360 with almost all the S austriaca post 1980 and a lot of the S coccinea probably wrongly assigned.
Mal
Yes it was the only one in the Phillips book read by the majority of amature mycologists in the 1980/90s and so almost all finds in that era were designated as S coccinea. On the national records database they have a ratio of 340 : 1360 with almost all the S austriaca post 1980 and a lot of the S coccinea probably wrongly assigned.
Mal