18-07-2025 23:03
Josep Torres
Hello.Fruitings between 51 and 130 microns in tota
16-07-2025 17:34
Bernard Declercq
Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention
14-07-2025 11:20
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Voici une espèce de (?) Hyaloscyphace
16-01-2023 21:31
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on
14-07-2025 17:55
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de
14-07-2025 11:17
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest
14-07-2025 15:52
Gernot FriebesHi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae
14-07-2025 13:37
Gernot FriebesHi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari
Pseudophacidium necans?
Stefan Blaser,
14-12-2013 11:11
I identified this discomycete as Pseudophacidium necans. However, I would like to have some confirmation on my identification. Generally, characters and measurements (see pics) fit quite well with the description I have from M.C. Egger (Morphologie und Biologie von Pseudophacidiumarten). Paraphyses are more pointed compared to the drawing in Egger and inward looking cells from the cover layer are sometimes also pointed and slender (pic3). I identified the substrate as Buxus based on wood anatomy (pic7).
Are there any othe species that should be considered, or do you think it fits?
Thanks, Stefan
Hans-Otto Baral,
14-12-2013 12:30
Re : Pseudophacidium necans?
Hi Stefan
this could be Pseudophacidium cf. necans (HB 5211 & 3943). Are your spores around 15-20 x 5-8? Slight variation in spore size is visible on the photos and drawings I have in my necans folder. The tapering paraphyses and the swollen periphyses (cells inside the lobes) might be characteristic.
I do not remember why I was unsure. There is also an anamorph that I saw 8see below).
Zotto
this could be Pseudophacidium cf. necans (HB 5211 & 3943). Are your spores around 15-20 x 5-8? Slight variation in spore size is visible on the photos and drawings I have in my necans folder. The tapering paraphyses and the swollen periphyses (cells inside the lobes) might be characteristic.
I do not remember why I was unsure. There is also an anamorph that I saw 8see below).
Zotto
Stefan Blaser,
14-12-2013 19:23
Re : Pseudophacidium necans?
Hi Zotto
Yes, Spores fit perfectly to that range. So, without strong opposition I think I name it P. necans. Thanks a lot.
Stefan
Yes, Spores fit perfectly to that range. So, without strong opposition I think I name it P. necans. Thanks a lot.
Stefan
Hans-Otto Baral,
14-12-2013 20:25
Re : Pseudophacidium necans?
Please tell us the spore size you have found. It could be important for future comparison.
Zotto
Zotto
Stefan Blaser,
14-12-2013 23:44
Re : Pseudophacidium necans?
Sure, Sorry:
15-19 x 6.5-8 is what I noted
Stefan
15-19 x 6.5-8 is what I noted
Stefan
Hans-Otto Baral,
15-12-2013 10:06
Re : Pseudophacidium necans?
This fits perfectly :-)
I think now that my drawings belong to the same species.
I think now that my drawings belong to the same species.