Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

07-02-2023 22:28

Ethan Crenson

Hello friends, On Sunday, in the southern part of

19-02-2026 17:49

Salvador Emilio Jose

Hola buenas tardes!! Necesito ayuda para la ident

09-02-2026 22:01

ruiz Jose

Hola, me paso esta colección en madera de pino, t

19-02-2026 13:50

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this collection on deciduous wood on 7-2-

19-02-2026 12:01

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Me mandan el material de Galicia (España), recole

17-02-2026 09:41

Maren Kamke Maren Kamke

Good morning, I found a Diaporthe species on Samb

16-02-2026 21:25

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening,failed to find an idea for this fungu

08-12-2025 17:37

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened

17-02-2026 17:26

Nicolas Suberbielle Nicolas Suberbielle

Bonjour à tous, Je recherche cette publication :

03-02-2013 19:50

Nina Filippova

Good time), I've compared this specimen with the

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Geopysis
Fermin Pancorbo, 21-08-2013 16:12
Fermin PancorboHi evrybody,

Apothecia 7-15mm in diameter, on a small slope of a mountain stream to 1826 m. in altitude between roots of Juniperus communis and next to bryophytes. Stalk very short, almost hidden in the adhering earth. Smell unpleasant, sulfurous components.

Microscopy:
Spores oval, smooth, (15.8) 16.3 to 18 (18.5) x (9.2) 9.4 to 10.3 (10.8) µm, Q = (1.6) 1.64 to 1.8 (1.9), N = 62;I = 17.2 x 9.9 µm; Qe = 1.7, enveloped in a mucilaginous sheath (0.9) 0.95 to 1.5 (1.7) µm;Me = 1.2 µm.


Asci no amyloid, 266.8 to 295.9 x 13.2 to 15.2 µm; I = 282.6 x 14.4 m. Bifurcated or single base.


Paraphyses filiform, septate, slightly widened at apex, often with diverticulate growths.


Marginal hyphae septate, sinuous and rather variable morphology, apex widened, more or less diverticulate (3.8) 3.9 to 6.9 (7.7) µm thick.


Texture of two types: under hymenium, texture intricata from 160.9 to 181.7µm formed by hyphae (4.5) from 5.1 to 8 (9.4) ?m. Then, texture
globuloso-angularis 90.7 to 102.89 µm, with elements of (17.3) 19.2 to 27.7 (28.8) µm in diameter.


According to the work "GARNWEIDNER, E., T. R. LOHMEYER, H. MARXMÜLLER (1991) Vel-Geopysis foetida., G. Alpine v. Taxa nahestehende und Höhnel - mehr als Fragen Antworten", mucilaginous sheath of spores and stipe barely evident, appears to be an important element that distinguishes Geopysis alpina.

My spores measurements are somewhat larger than those defined in this work, but I do not know how important it can be.

I would like to seek your opinion on this collection.

  • message #24861
  • message #24861
  • message #24861
  • message #24861
  • message #24861
  • message #24861
  • message #24861
  • message #24861
  • message #24861
Fermin Pancorbo, 21-08-2013 16:21
Fermin Pancorbo
Re : Geopysis
Sorry!!

I have write Geopysis instead of Geopyxis!!
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 21-08-2013 16:37
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Geopysis

Hi Fermin.
This collection enters in the alpina/foetida complex. I sequenced collections with and without smell, and all are the same...

Nico   

Fermin Pancorbo, 22-08-2013 16:24
Fermin Pancorbo
Re : Geopysis
Thank you very much, Nico.
I'm afraid that.