27-02-2026 11:21
Yannick Mourgues
Hi to all. Here is a specie that can may be relat
18-03-2026 13:09
Khomenko Igor
I recently examined Celtis occidentalis branches
18-03-2026 18:42
Gonzalez Garcia MartaI have collected some lyre-shaped apothecia on the
18-03-2026 17:22
Katarina PastircakovaHi there,I'm looking for the following literature:
27-11-2025 15:41
Thomas LæssøeSpores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;
18-03-2026 11:52
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493688
11-03-2026 17:36
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Je cherche des indices pour cette réc
17-03-2026 10:40
Martine Vandeplanque
Bonjour à tous.Chaque année en mars ou avril, il
17-03-2026 19:41
Bernard CLESSE
Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à
12-03-2026 19:44
Hi to everybody.Can you give me any suggestions ab
Hi evrybody,Apothecia 7-15mm in diameter, on a small slope of a mountain stream to 1826 m. in altitude between roots of Juniperus communis and next to bryophytes. Stalk very short, almost hidden in the adhering earth. Smell unpleasant, sulfurous components.
Microscopy:
Spores oval, smooth, (15.8) 16.3 to 18 (18.5) x (9.2) 9.4 to 10.3 (10.8) µm, Q = (1.6) 1.64 to 1.8 (1.9), N = 62;I = 17.2 x 9.9 µm; Qe = 1.7, enveloped in a mucilaginous sheath (0.9) 0.95 to 1.5 (1.7) µm;Me = 1.2 µm.
Asci no amyloid, 266.8 to 295.9 x 13.2 to 15.2 µm; I = 282.6 x 14.4 m. Bifurcated or single base.
Paraphyses filiform, septate, slightly widened at apex, often with diverticulate growths.
Marginal hyphae septate, sinuous and rather variable morphology, apex widened, more or less diverticulate (3.8) 3.9 to 6.9 (7.7) µm thick.
Texture of two types: under hymenium, texture intricata from 160.9 to 181.7µm formed by hyphae (4.5) from 5.1 to 8 (9.4) ?m. Then, texture
globuloso-angularis 90.7 to 102.89 µm, with elements of (17.3) 19.2 to 27.7 (28.8) µm in diameter.
According to the work "GARNWEIDNER, E., T. R. LOHMEYER, H. MARXMÜLLER (1991) Vel-Geopysis foetida., G. Alpine v. Taxa nahestehende und Höhnel - mehr als Fragen Antworten", mucilaginous sheath of spores and stipe barely evident, appears to be an important element that distinguishes Geopysis alpina.
My spores measurements are somewhat larger than those defined in this work, but I do not know how important it can be.
I would like to seek your opinion on this collection.
I have write Geopysis instead of Geopyxis!!
Hi Fermin.
This collection enters in the alpina/foetida complex. I sequenced collections with and without smell, and all are the same...
Nico
I'm afraid that.








