14-07-2025 11:20
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Voici une espèce de (?) Hyaloscyphace
16-07-2025 17:34
Bernard Declercq
Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention
16-01-2023 21:31
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on
14-07-2025 17:55
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de
14-07-2025 11:17
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest
14-07-2025 15:52
Gernot FriebesHi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae
14-07-2025 13:37
Gernot FriebesHi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari
12-07-2025 16:45
Thierry Blondelle
Bonjour à tous,J'avais d'abord pensé à des stro
Leucoscypha semi-immersa
Björn Wergen,
16-11-2010 23:32
Hello,I have some problems with these two findings:
The first one is, hopefully my determination is correct, Leucoscypha semi-immersa (micro see photo). Fb size about 2-6 mm, orange-brown.
The second species is perhaps not L. semi-immersa, even if it looks like this in the microscopic features. But have a look on the macrophoto, it shows a completely different ascomata being bigger in size (4-12 mm) and having another color.
Are the showed species two different one or just an example of L. semi-immera variability?
Thanks a lot,
cheers, Kazuya
Björn Wergen,
16-11-2010 23:33
Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
micro_1
Björn Wergen,
16-11-2010 23:33
Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
micro_2
Björn Wergen,
16-11-2010 23:34
Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
the other one, macro
Björn Wergen,
16-11-2010 23:34
Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
micro
Michel Hairaud,
16-11-2010 23:41
Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
Hi Kazama,
Are the apos lying on burnt ground ?
I would suggest then Leucoscypha patavina which is also fairly common on sandy soil on the coas.
Amitiés
Michel
Are the apos lying on burnt ground ?
I would suggest then Leucoscypha patavina which is also fairly common on sandy soil on the coas.
Amitiés
Michel
Björn Wergen,
17-11-2010 00:19
Re:Leucoscypha semi-immersa
Hi Michel,
I have also thought about L. patavina, it was even my first thought after I had found this species. I am not sure now, I will proof it tomorrow, but the key did not take me to L. patavina, but to L. semi-immersa, which was already found and determined. This one is NOT L. semi-immersa, I think.
I cannot tell you if it is burnt ground. If yes, it was not obvious, but I am sure the location had something special, perhaps also with some burnt ground.
cheers and thanks,
Kazuya
I have also thought about L. patavina, it was even my first thought after I had found this species. I am not sure now, I will proof it tomorrow, but the key did not take me to L. patavina, but to L. semi-immersa, which was already found and determined. This one is NOT L. semi-immersa, I think.
I cannot tell you if it is burnt ground. If yes, it was not obvious, but I am sure the location had something special, perhaps also with some burnt ground.
cheers and thanks,
Kazuya