Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

05-03-2026 10:07

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello, I found and collected this species growing

12-03-2026 15:45

Åge Oterhals

Dear forum,I found this small discomycete on a ver

12-03-2026 16:17

Sylvie Le Goff

Bonjour à tousRécolté dans le 22 en France (ré

11-03-2026 17:36

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Je cherche des indices  pour cette réc

14-03-2026 13:51

Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Hi everybody Under Quercus ilex, i hesitate to na

12-03-2026 19:44

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to everybody.Can you give me any suggestions ab

08-03-2026 14:05

Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Bonjour à tous,Sur 3 récoltes supposées de H. l

12-03-2026 14:37

David Wasilewski

These small ascomycota (1-3 mm) ere observed growi

11-03-2026 16:48

Bruno Coué Bruno Coué

Bonjour, je serais heureux d'avoir votre avis sur

09-02-2026 22:01

ruiz Jose

Hola, me paso esta colección en madera de pino, t

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Diaporthe spiculosa?
Maren Kamke, 17-02-2026 09:41
Maren KamkeGood morning,

I found a Diaporthe species on Sambucus nigra that I currently suspect to be Diaporthe spiculosa. I would greatly appreciate any opinions or confirmation regarding this identification.


The full field documentation and photos are available here: 
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/338900548


Kind regards,
Maren

Mathias Hass, 17-02-2026 10:29
Mathias Hass
Re : Diaporthe spiculosa?
Looks like Diaporthe. It seems to me what I would call Diaporthe circumscripta (as in Ellis and Ellis). I was not aware of the name D. spiculosa. Curiously Diaporthe circumscripta is listed some places (eg. Bladmineerders) as synonym to Aglaospora profusa (Pleosporales !!!), but not by Index Fungorum, which has Aglaospora profusa by the current name Massaria anomia. I have no idea what the correct name should be or whether D. spiculosa and D. circumscripta are the same thing or different species.

Cheers Mathias
Enrique Rubio, 17-02-2026 14:01
Enrique Rubio
Re : Diaporthe spiculosa?
Hi both.
This is what I identified years ago as Diaporthe spiculosa on Sambucus nigra. The spores appear to be larger than those cited for Diaporthe circumscripta.
Cheers
  • message #84609
  • message #84609
Mathias Hass, 18-02-2026 12:54
Mathias Hass
Re : Diaporthe spiculosa?
Maybe helpful
  • message #84622
Mathias Hass, 18-02-2026 14:13
Mathias Hass
Re : Diaporthe spiculosa?
Wehmeyer (p.261) seem to consider D.spiculosa synonymous with D. circumscripta. His sporemeasures are: 12-15 x 2,5-4. See:

Enrique Rubio, 18-02-2026 20:26
Enrique Rubio
Re : Diaporthe spiculosa?
Hi Mathias.

However, Wehmeyer (The Genus Diaporthe) considers Diaporthe spiculosa to be a priority. Basyonim. Spaheria spiculosa Alb. & Schwein.
  • message #84626
Mathias Hass, 18-02-2026 22:14
Mathias Hass
Re : Diaporthe spiculosa?
Hi Enrique,

I guess you are rigth, but I'm not into the finer details of taxonomy :-) Hypoxylon spiculosum (1857) -> Diaporthe spiculosa (1870) (the name Spaheria spiculosa(1805) is listed as nom. illegit.) seems to beat Diaporthe circumscripta (1870) . Of course this asumes that the are the same species...would require DNA to be certain, I guess, as Diaporthe species differ very little in morphology.
Maren Kamke, 18-02-2026 23:21
Maren Kamke
Re : Diaporthe spiculosa?
Hi Mathias, hi Enrique,
thanks a lot to both of you for the helpful input.

Based on your comments (and Wehmeyer's treatment), I'm happy to keep this collection under Diaporthe spiculosa (= D. circumscripta sensu Wehmeyer) on Sambucus nigra. I agree that morphology alone has its limits in Diaporthe, so I've kept the specimen in case sequencing can be done later to confirm the determination.


Kind regards,
Maren