22-12-2025 00:47
Patrice TANCHAUDBonsoir, récolte à proximité du milieu dunaire
21-12-2025 21:32
Pol DebaenstHello, Garden, Burgweg 19, Veurne, BelgiumOn 10/1
21-12-2025 21:40
Isabelle CharissouBonjour, j'aimerais connaitre les références de
21-12-2025 21:31
Pol DebaenstHello, Garden, Burgweg 19, Veurne, BelgiumOn 10/1
21-12-2025 21:31
Pol DebaenstHello, Garden, Burgweg 19, Veurne, BelgiumOn 10/1
20-12-2025 23:08
Patrice TANCHAUDBonsoir, récolte sur sol sablonneux dans l'arriÃ
21-12-2025 09:32
Josep Torres
Hello.A tiny ascomycete found embedded in wood in
20-12-2025 15:47
Mirek GrycHi.These grew on pine wood that was heavily covere
Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
09-01-2021 16:42
.. collected 8.6.20, Germany, Bavaria, Neuburg a.d. Donau, "Kreut", on Mentha longifolia. I think almost everything fits with T. sulphurea (that grows (only?) on Urtica), including the hemiamyloid pore, with the exception of the small spores - I measured them 23-33/+-3 µm.
Is this too small or can it still be accepted for sulphurea?
Best regards, Lothar
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2021 17:18
Re : Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
Hi Lothar
in my foles this is the perfect spores size of sulphurea = nylanderi: I have in my folder name 18-39 x 2,5-3,5(-4).
The asci are withou croziers?
I had the spacies once on Impatiens gland. and Francois valade on Phytolacca.
Zotto
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
09-01-2021 17:28
Re : Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
thank you, Zotto!
I have looked in an older key of yours, where the measures are larger.
I must more look in your folders, in future ...
So everything is o.k.
Best regards, Lothar
P.S. I fear I did not look for the croziers ...
I have looked in an older key of yours, where the measures are larger.
I must more look in your folders, in future ...
So everything is o.k.
Best regards, Lothar
P.S. I fear I did not look for the croziers ...
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2021 17:31
Re : Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
I can't find larger measurements, only the width may go to *3-3.8(-4).
But you are right, my old key says 33-38/2,5-3,5 µm, so neglects shorter spores.