
11-09-2025 16:57
Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is

13-09-2025 14:10
Wim de GrootWe found this hymenoscyphus on rubus fruticulosis.

13-09-2025 14:01
Thomas Flammerdark brown apothecia, splitIKI-Spores biguttulate

10-09-2025 23:53

Found on Robinia pseudoacasia together with Diapor

10-09-2025 17:18

Hola, encontre este estiercol de vaca estos apotec

02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903
Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
09-01-2021 16:42

I think almost everything fits with T. sulphurea (that grows (only?) on Urtica), including the hemiamyloid pore, with the exception of the small spores - I measured them 23-33/+-3 µm.
Is this too small or can it still be accepted for sulphurea?
Best regards, Lothar
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2021 17:18

Re : Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
Hi Lothar
in my foles this is the perfect spores size of sulphurea = nylanderi: I have in my folder name 18-39 x 2,5-3,5(-4).
The asci are withou croziers?
I had the spacies once on Impatiens gland. and Francois valade on Phytolacca.
Zotto
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
09-01-2021 17:28

Re : Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
thank you, Zotto!
I have looked in an older key of yours, where the measures are larger.
I must more look in your folders, in future ...
So everything is o.k.
Best regards, Lothar
P.S. I fear I did not look for the croziers ...
I have looked in an older key of yours, where the measures are larger.
I must more look in your folders, in future ...
So everything is o.k.
Best regards, Lothar
P.S. I fear I did not look for the croziers ...
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2021 17:31

Re : Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
I can't find larger measurements, only the width may go to *3-3.8(-4).
But you are right, my old key says 33-38/2,5-3,5 µm, so neglects shorter spores.