Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

24-02-2026 00:21

Benoît Segerer

Hello,I'm new to this forum, I hope I won't be irr

24-02-2026 11:01

Gernot Friebes

Hi,found on a branch of Tilia, with conidia measur

23-02-2026 11:22

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10584971

29-11-2024 21:47

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourJ'avais un deuxième échantillon moins mat

07-02-2023 22:28

Ethan Crenson

Hello friends, On Sunday, in the southern part of

19-02-2026 17:49

Salvador Emilio Jose

Hola buenas tardes!! Necesito ayuda para la ident

09-02-2026 22:01

ruiz Jose

Hola, me paso esta colección en madera de pino, t

19-02-2026 13:50

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this collection on deciduous wood on 7-2-

19-02-2026 12:01

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Me mandan el material de Galicia (España), recole

17-02-2026 09:41

Maren Kamke Maren Kamke

Good morning, I found a Diaporthe species on Samb

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana