Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

12-11-2019 10:32

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Hi againExactly at the same place than my previous

25-12-2019 17:54

Valencia Lopez Francisco Javier

Hola a todos/asEstas supuestas pezizas estaban en

28-07-2011 18:31

Alex Akulov Alex Akulov

Dear FriendsToday I made the pdf file of Velenovsk

12-07-2015 00:05

Nedim Jukic Nedim Jukic

This one from the same locality as the previous on

28-08-2014 18:36

Rubén Martínez-Gil Rubén Martínez-Gil

Hola a todos. Subo unas fotos de un asco que enco

31-05-2026 22:53

éric ROMERO éric ROMERO

Bonjour tous, Je n'ai pas d'idée pour cette esp

30-05-2026 21:12

Philippe PELLICIER

Sur branche de mélèze (Larix) près de la neige,

31-05-2026 10:35

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello,I collected this species growing on a rather

25-05-2026 16:35

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,

29-05-2026 15:35

daniel FERRE

Bonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre aide pour cette

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana