Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

31-08-2025 17:32

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Pas d'identité trouvée pour cette réc

31-08-2025 19:41

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to someone.I need to download this issue of Sve

31-08-2025 14:34

Thomas Flammer

I have found a Rutstroemia on abt. 2000 m on Alnus

29-08-2025 19:04

Thomas Flammer

Spores 21.2 - 26.2 x 8.3 - 11.3 µm - Q: 2.20 - 2.

30-08-2025 18:29

Joaquin Martin

Hi,I found this undetermined ascomycete on broadle

28-08-2025 17:24

Thomas Flammer

I know, that this is not the real topic of this fo

29-08-2025 05:16

Francois Guay Francois Guay

I think I may have found the teleomorph of Dendros

24-08-2025 21:59

Edmond POINTE Edmond POINTE

Bonsoir amis mycologues,Trouvé sur crottin de che

27-08-2025 12:02

Pavol Palo

Hello dear friendsI would like to ask for sharing

25-08-2025 17:37

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour,Nous avons trouvé samedi dernier à l'ét

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana