Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

30-04-2025 01:29

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi, I found Dactylellina candida/candidum, recent

29-04-2025 09:13

Louis DENY

Bonjour forumVosges du sud, ballon d'Alsace altitu

28-04-2025 12:51

Thomas Flammer

Substrate: Angelica sylvesrisSpore mass: 8.4 - 11.

12-05-2013 13:31

Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová) Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)

Dear mycologists,could someone give me an advice a

18-04-2025 23:16

Robin Pétermann Robin Pétermann

Bonjour, Voici une probable Mollisia, genre que j

26-04-2025 07:15

Dragiša Savic

Hello everyone,the lichen is Candelariella aurella

27-04-2025 15:54

Martin Bemmann Martin Bemmann

Can somebody provide this article from a Leningrad

14-04-2025 15:11

Lennert Gees

Greetings!For my master's dissertation I work on c

26-04-2025 16:01

Jacques Fournier Jacques Fournier

J'ai le regret d'informer les membres du forum qui

26-04-2025 19:32

Francois Guay Francois Guay

I found these small Arachnopeziza sp. growing on d

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana