Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

19-08-2022 22:26

Juuso Äikäs

A few years ago I found a group of olive-brown fru

19-08-2022 19:05

Stefan Jakobsson

On a petiole of a leaf of what seems to be Populus

09-08-2022 20:06

Stephen Mifsud Stephen Mifsud

I have found an interesting aspergillus on flowers

13-08-2022 17:18

Stephen Mifsud Stephen Mifsud

I assumed these are weak colonies of Neurospora on

18-08-2022 17:50

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10283042

10-08-2022 15:45

Pierre-Yves Julien

Récolte le 31/07/2022 – Ozoir-la-Ferrière (77)

02-08-2022 17:48

Pierre-Yves Julien

Récolte le 31/07/2022 – Ozoir-la-Ferrière (77)

16-08-2022 20:07

Bernard Declercq Bernard Declercq

Good evening,Who could be so kind to supply me fol

07-01-2014 23:04

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour à tous, Hi to all. This tiny bright yell

16-08-2022 15:50

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10283169

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana