Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

11-01-2026 20:35

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A very tiny pyrenomycete sprouting sparsely

09-01-2026 17:41

Arnold Büschlen

Hallo, F. dilatata wird von vielen Bryoparasiten

10-01-2026 20:00

Tom Schrier

Hi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur

07-01-2026 22:22

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Tatraea sp. on indet. hardwood The Swag, Great Sm

10-01-2026 01:18

Danny Newman Danny Newman

cf. Neovaginatispora fuckelii on indet. shrub Pre

07-01-2026 10:24

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Pezicula sp. on indet. hardwood Appalachian Highl

09-01-2026 10:08

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, en el mismo habitat que la anteriorRetamaDia

08-01-2026 21:22

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, He recogido esta muestra de Orbilia sobre Re

07-01-2026 17:29

Marc Detollenaere Marc Detollenaere

Dear Forum,On a barkless Populus I found some smal

10-11-2021 17:33

Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Add-on topic http://www.ascofrance.com/forum/7059

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana