Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

25-03-2026 10:35

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello,I collected this species growing on a dead b

26-03-2026 15:31

Ãke Widgren Åke Widgren

Hello,I found this one in October last year, on r

26-03-2026 12:50

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi,I'm having a hard time figuring which Pseudombr

26-03-2026 11:17

Vasileios Kaounas Vasileios Kaounas

Found 11-03-26, in leaf of Ulmus sp. Diameter 2-4

25-03-2026 22:23

Marc Detollenaere Marc Detollenaere

Dear Forum,On a debarked stem of Tilia, we found s

24-03-2026 15:44

Åge Oterhals

I hope someone can confirm the name of this collec

25-03-2026 20:53

François Bartholomeeusen

Dear forum members,On 23 March 2026, I found sever

23-03-2026 20:16

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good eveningI'm unable to identify this Coprotus o

25-03-2026 15:06

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me confirm

25-03-2026 13:54

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Does anyone know where I could download Paoletti's

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana