Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

09-04-2026 15:25

Jac Gelderblom

On bare soil between mosses Ifound an asco I deter

09-04-2026 13:55

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10589176

09-04-2026 10:12

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10587061

08-04-2026 20:33

Vasileios Kaounas Vasileios Kaounas

Found 07-04-26, in Abies cephalonica. Diameter 1,

08-04-2026 10:39

FRANCIS FOUCHIER

Bonjour , je recherche en pdf cet article: KORF R

06-04-2026 15:04

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi! Could someone help me identifying this specim

29-06-2016 15:18

Per Vetlesen

HiIt was found on the bark of a dead branch of Jun

07-01-2018 22:47

Per Vetlesen

Grown in moist chamber on bark/resin of fallen Pin

06-04-2026 21:36

Viktorie Halasu Viktorie Halasu

Hello, could anyone please send me the article wi

06-04-2026 19:40

David Gibbs David Gibbs

Help with this one much appreciated, on rotting Fa

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana