Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

18-12-2025 21:17

Pol Debaenst

The identification took me to Byssonectria deformi

15-12-2025 07:09

Danny Newman Danny Newman

indet. Rutstroemiaceae sp. on unk. fallen leavesMc

19-12-2025 10:10

Patrice TANCHAUD

Bonjour, récolte réalisée en milieu dunaire, a

18-12-2025 17:23

Bruno Coué Bruno Coué

Bonjour,je serais heureux d'avoir votre avis sur c

18-12-2025 18:07

Margot en Geert Vullings

These plumes were found on rotten wood.They strong

17-12-2025 18:35

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour à tous/Hi to everyone I am passing along

21-11-2025 10:47

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour,Peut-être Mollisia palustris ?Trouvée su

15-12-2025 15:48

Danny Newman Danny Newman

Melanospora cf. lagenaria on old, rotting, fallen

15-12-2025 15:54

Johan Boonefaes Johan Boonefaes

Unknown anamorph found on the ground in coastal sa

15-12-2025 21:11

Hardware Tony Hardware Tony

Small clavate hairs, negative croziers and IKI bb

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana