Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

23-09-2025 13:31

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623

15-10-2025 16:39

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

These tiny (0.2-0.6 mm), white, pulvinate apotheci

03-10-2025 13:44

Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde on Populus

13-10-2025 19:05

Louis DENY

Bonjour forumSur tronc décortiqué de feuillu x,

17-02-2013 21:11

Peter Welt Peter Welt

Jamoni, P.G. 1998. Un nuovo discomicete coprofilo

11-10-2025 20:27

Marcel Heyligen Marcel Heyligen

Found on a barked branch, 14 mm in diameter, of Ro

11-10-2025 14:20

Jean-Luc Ranger

bonjour à tous, Je ne vois pas comment l'on peut

09-10-2025 22:14

S. Rebecca

We just had the Bavarian Mycology Conference in Au

10-10-2025 00:49

Ethan Crenson

Hello all, This was found last weekend on a hardw

06-10-2025 15:57

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi, Could anyone help me with this Lophiostoma? 

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Eutypa lejoplaca?
Garcia Susana, 23-01-2014 14:32
Hi all

I found this Pyrenomycete, growing on wood of Acer campestre.
Perithecia size is 200-260um in diameter. Ostioles are 115-140um in diameter and have a cruciform shape.
Asci measured 55-68 × 5-7um, area spores 15-23 × 5-6.5um. With IKI, the apical apparatus becomes more apparent, but I'm not able to say if it is IKI +. in any case would be weakly positive.
Persistent paraphyses.

Following keys Rappaz, came to Eutypa Lejoplaca but I doubt if it could be another species, such as E. maura, or leptoplaca (if I consider the reaction to IKI is +).


Can anyone identify the species with the data provided?


Thank you,


Susana (Spain)

  • message #27030
  • message #27030
  • message #27030
  • message #27030
Jacques Fournier, 23-01-2014 17:49
Jacques Fournier
Re : Eutypa lejoplaca?
Hola Susana,
you are right, your fungus is likely around E. leptoplaca and E. lejoplaca. Eutypa maura can be ruled out because it is distinctive in having more immersed perithecia and the wood markedly blackened beneath the surface between the necks.
The most reliable difference between the two species is the reaction of the apical apparatus to iodine.
I suggest you follow Rappaz's procedure with a short pretreatment of perithecial content in 3% KOH and mounting in Melzer's reagent. This leads to a more drastic retraction of the ascal content than IKI and makes the apical apparatus easier to make out. Remember it is in fact subapical, at the bottom of a shallow tubular structure. The thing is to work on a very small amount of material in order to make a very thin slide, otherwise interpreting the iodine reaction is most often tricky, especially in species where the apical apparatus is very small. This applies to all species of Diatrypaceae since the character of reaction to iodine is crucial.
Come back with a clear result, whatever how long it takes!
Cheers,
Jacques
Garcia Susana, 23-01-2014 21:50
Re : Eutypa lejoplaca?
Salut Jacques

¿C'est la réaction tout aussi intense avec KOH + Melzer, qui KOH + IKI?


J'ai fait quelques préparations KOH + IKI (je n'ai pas de Melzer) et pense que c'est positif, j'observe dans les asques un couple de très petits points que je dirais sont bleus.


Que pensez-vous?


Saludos


Susana

  • message #27050
Jacques Fournier, 24-01-2014 08:56
Jacques Fournier
Re : Eutypa lejoplaca?
Hola Susana,
ton excellente photo montre bien une réaction positive, amyloide. Tu peux donc écarter lejoplaca.
E. leptoplaca est beaucoup plus fréquente sur Fraxinus, tu devrais la trouver facilement sur des petites branches tombées récemment avec le vent et tu pourras ainsi lui comparer ta récolte.
Amitiés,
Jacques
Garcia Susana, 24-01-2014 11:04
Re : Eutypa lejoplaca?
Muchas gracias Jacques

Saludos.
Susana