20-02-2019 08:22
Patrice TANCHAUDSur épicéa. Spores 7,5-10 x 2,5-3 µm. Merci d'
21-02-2019 11:29
Per Marstad
I have found this on Fraxinus excelsior, in Norway
21-02-2019 13:35
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Found 31-01-2019 by a mushroomfriend on he
05-12-2016 14:44
Malcolm Greaves
I am trying to find out why one of the British fun
19-02-2019 22:35
Bernard CLESSE
Sur bourgeon pourri de peuplier du Canada, caché
19-02-2019 19:49
Blasco Rafael
Hola, alguna idea de a que genero debo mirar ???,
Hyaloscypha aureliella / britannica
Patrice TANCHAUD,
20-02-2019 08:22
Sur épicéa. Spores 7,5-10 x 2,5-3 µm.
Merci d'avance pour vos avis.
Patrice
Doc1-0054.pdf
Kosonen Timo,
20-02-2019 08:32
Re : Hyaloscypha aureliella / britannica
Hello,
Let's start with the ecology: Softwood/hardwood - can you confirm? Ascus base needs to be checked also. And then a MLZ mount of the excipular cells. ...could be, or could be something totally else :-)
Timo
Patrice TANCHAUD,
20-02-2019 08:56
Re : Hyaloscypha aureliella / britannica
Epicéa = Picea Abies.
I will put new pictures tonight.
Kosonen Timo,
20-02-2019 09:35
Re : Hyaloscypha aureliella / britannica
Ah, of course, sloppy me.
H. britannica is supposed to have atleast some septate spores (10-20 %). Also there should be some spores clearly over 10 um in length if it was britannica. And take a careful look at the hairs: How resistent hair resin is in MLZ, does it dissolve immediately or is it still there. They both have crozier, check that also. It's not always easy, you could try congo red just to check the ascus base.
T
Patrice TANCHAUD,
22-02-2019 09:14
Re : Hyaloscypha aureliella / britannica
I do not see septate spores. No spore over 10 µm. Hair resin seems to dissolve easily, but not easy to calculate. Croziers present.
Thanks.
Kosonen Timo,
22-02-2019 10:00
Re : Hyaloscypha aureliella / britannica
okay!
H. aureliella & conifer. Just as in maybe 98% of the cases.
Never seen H. britannica here in Scandinavia. Stip Helleman has collected H. britannica and he considered it as very rear and not a boreal species. But it is definately a good species (sequences & morphology). Keep your eyes open :-).
Timo
Patrice TANCHAUD,
22-02-2019 10:25
Re : Hyaloscypha aureliella / britannica
Thanks for all.
Patrice
Patrice