Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

03-03-2026 20:34

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good eveningThese small, amphora-shaped perithecia

28-02-2026 11:54

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

Hi forum,Is anyone aware if the 1936 edition of Si

02-03-2026 22:07

Jorge Hernanz

Buenas noches!Entre musgos, bajo Pinus halepensis

01-03-2026 18:02

Francois Guay Francois Guay

I found this mystery Helotiales on an incubated le

28-02-2026 14:43

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

A new refrence desired :Svanidze, T.V. (1984) Novy

01-03-2026 18:46

Robin Isaksson Robin Isaksson

Hi! This species i se from time to time in the

26-02-2026 22:06

Malcolm  Greaves Malcolm Greaves

Can someone explain the features that split Geoscy

27-02-2026 17:51

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Quelqu'un peut il me donner un conseil p

27-02-2026 16:17

Mathias Hass Mathias Hass

Hi, Found this on Betula, rather fresh fallen twi

01-03-2026 14:10

Antonio Couceiro Antonio Couceiro

Hola, me gustaria conocer opiniones sobre este tem

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Rutstroemia maritima?
William Slosse, 11-02-2026 22:15
William SlosseToday, February 11, 2026, we found the following Rutstroemia in the drifting dunes at Bredene (Belgian coast).
The habitat and substrate (dead leaves of Ammophila arenaria) suggest Rutstroemia maritima.
° Crystals present in the texture
° Croziers present
° Ascus tips euamyloid (in Melzer, my Lugol unfortunately appears to be degenerated...).
A sporee is currently being prepared to measure spores in water.
Can this observation be confirmed, or do further preparations need to be made/examined?
Thanks in advance,
William
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
Hans-Otto Baral, 11-02-2026 22:30
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Rutstroemia maritima?
The rather thin apical dome looks typical to me. Please do the spore photo in water to see living spores.
William Slosse, 12-02-2026 17:17
William Slosse
Re : Rutstroemia maritima?
And here are the spores from a sporee and measured in water:

(13.6) 14.1 - 17.8 (18.4) × (5.8) 6 - 7.5 (7.9) µm
Q = (2.2) 2.3 - 2.58 (2.6) ; N = 20
Me = 15.6 × 6.5 µm ; Qe = 2.4

Additional questions:
1. According to Index Fungorum, the current name is Clarireedia maritima. Is this nomenclature preferable?
2. Should this species be listed as Clarireedia cf maritima, or is it clearly described and recognized as such?

Thanks in advance,
William

  • message #84532
  • message #84532
  • message #84532
  • message #84532
  • message #84532
Hans-Otto Baral, 12-02-2026 17:52
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Rutstroemia maritima?
This is a full match. The genus is a matter of taste. From DNA Clarireedia is a well-defined group, but from morphology I see hardly any chance to separate it from the core of Rutstroemia.

In my folders I use Clarireedia. There you can see the high similarity among the collections on Ammophila.
William Slosse, 12-02-2026 18:52
William Slosse
Re : Rutstroemia maritima?
Thx, Zotto!