Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

06-03-2026 09:41

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

Hi forum, I'm now looking for another reference c

28-02-2026 11:05

Yanick BOULANGER

Bonjour à tousLe 24/02/2026 à Montmacq, devant m

06-03-2026 17:51

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening all,On March 4, 2026, I found the fol

05-03-2026 10:07

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello, I found and collected this species growing

05-03-2026 19:29

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone,On March 4, 2026, I found th

05-03-2026 16:30

François Bartholomeeusen

Dear forum members, On the 2nd of February 2026,

19-02-2026 17:49

Salvador Emilio Jose

Hola buenas tardes!! Necesito ayuda para la ident

03-03-2026 20:34

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good eveningThese small, amphora-shaped perithecia

28-02-2026 11:54

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

Hi forum,Is anyone aware if the 1936 edition of Si

02-03-2026 22:07

Jorge Hernanz

Buenas noches!Entre musgos, bajo Pinus halepensis

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Pithya cupressina with large apothecia looking like P. vulgaris.
Stephen Martin Mifsud, 04-01-2026 17:45
Stephen Martin MifsudI was happy to find these orange asmocyetes which at first glance I identified tentavely as Pithya vulgaris based on the size of the apothecium that ranged between 3.5 to 5.5cm and the substrate being a woody twig. P. cupressina, which I am familiar with, are here found of fallen leaves of Cupressus sempervirens and are up to 3mm wide (mostly barely 2mm).

Can I assign this finding to P. vulgaris or I still need further verifications (microscopical investigations).

  • message #84266
  • message #84266
  • message #84266
Stephen Martin Mifsud, 05-01-2026 08:22
Stephen Martin Mifsud
Re : Pithya vulgaris (or P. cupressina can still be considered)
Reading this article to help my determination..... not easy as it is in German. Will report back my conclusion. I am posting the link of the paper for other members who might find it useful.

https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/Mycologia-Bavarica_10_0055-0062.pdf
Stephen Martin Mifsud, 05-01-2026 09:28
Stephen Martin Mifsud
Re : Pithya vulgaris (or P. cupressina can still be considered)

After reading the paper, these are the most important features to distinguish P. cupressina and P. vulgaris (considered distinct species).


Spore Size (at maturity)
Pithya cupressina: (9) 10-12 (12.5) um
Pithya vulgaris 12-15 um

Substrate Specialization 
Pithya cupressina: Cupressaceae (e.g., Chamaecyparis, Cupressus, Juniperus, Sequoia, Thuja)
Pithya vulgaris: Pinaceae (usually Abies species, occasionally Picea, Pinus)

Size of Apothecia
Pithya cupressina: 2-5 mm wide
Pithya vulgaris: (5-) 10-15 mm wide

My finding was on an unkown twig up to 5.5mm wide and spores with the following measurments:  


9.1 [10.1 ; 10.6] 11.6 × 8.9 [9.9 ; 10.4] 11.3 µm
Q = 1 [1.0] 1.1 ; N = 27 ; C = 95%
Me = 10.4 × 10.1 µm ; Qe = 1



So it is (disappointingly) the usual Pithya cupressina which grew slightly larger up to 5mm possibly because they were growing on a woody twig, while on leaves and leaf petioles  fruiting bodies only reach  1-3mm in diameter (here in Malta). 

Eye-catching are the operculate asci !!! 

  • message #84268
  • message #84268
  • message #84268
  • message #84268