Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

11-05-2025 10:35

ruiz Jose

Hola, en excremento de jabali, tamaño de unos 2 m

11-05-2025 10:22

Karl Soler Kinnerbäck

Found on moist Betula wood dipped in freshwater st

11-05-2025 10:16

Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Hello everyone,I'm submitting this collection from

05-05-2025 10:09

Nicolas Suberbielle Nicolas Suberbielle

Re-bonjour,Cet ascomycète trouvé et étudié par

10-05-2025 18:47

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi, Does anyone have an idea of what this could b

09-05-2025 16:01

Thomas Flammer

I found a black cushon which might eventually be 

09-05-2025 19:10

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to everybody.This Orbilia (apos up to 0.5 mm),

02-05-2025 13:29

Isabelle Charissou

Bonjour, j'aimerais savoir s'il y a eu des public

06-05-2025 13:37

Thomas Flammer

Munk, Anders (1953). The System of the Pyrenomycet

08-05-2025 20:50

Andreas Jacob

Good evening, due to contstant drought I started

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lamprospora vs. Octospora
NC NC, 14-04-2009 22:10
hello forum,

i am in search of informations, which are concerned with the (strange) integration of lamprospora into octospora. in my view lamprospora is very good separated by globose spores and strong ornamentation (mostly reticulation). but recent studies seem to reject lamprospora. what are the intentions for that besides bryophily as a unifying aspect (which in my opinion can never be a main criteria to create a genera)?? or does anybody know
Wang, Yei-Zeng; Kimbrough, James W. (1992). Monographic Studies of North
American Species of Octospora previously ascribed to Lamprospora (Pezizales,
Ascomycetes). Special Publication no. 4, National Museum of Natural Science
and its basic argumentation?
i know that benkert doesn't follow this integration ...

best

dirk