10-06-2026 12:54
Steve ClementsBonjour encore, Pouvez-vous m'aider, s'il vous pl
10-06-2026 11:53
Steve ClementsBonjour, This disco is abundant on dead stems of
10-06-2026 10:45
François Freléchoux
Bonjour à nouveau, Encore une détermination qui
08-06-2026 10:16
Spooren Marco
I don`t have a clou about this fungus,it is not in
10-06-2026 09:24
François Freléchoux
Bonjour, J'imagine que cette détermination ne do
09-06-2026 18:32
Camille MertensSur morceau de roseau immergé 0,5 - 0,7 mm de dia
08-06-2026 17:00
François BartholomeeusenGood day everyone, On June 5 2026, I collected de
07-06-2026 15:10
William Slosse
Hello everyone,On 05-06-26, I found following asco
05-06-2026 11:02
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10596691
Tapesia
Chris Yeates,
05-02-2022 19:11
Bonsoir
Am I correct in thinking that while Tapesia is no longer considered to be a justifiable genus v. Mollisia, there are a number of combinations which have not yet been made? I am assuming that older combinations in Mollisia can be treated as the valid current name - e.g. M. evilescens (P. Karst.) Mussat, and M. fusca (Pers.) P. Karst. ?
Also I am assuming that a new specific name would be needed for Tapesia cinerella Rehm, which seems not to be conspecific with Mollisia cinerella Sacc.
Clarification welcomed!
Amitiés, Chris
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
07-02-2022 08:57
Re : Tapesia
Hi Chris.
Tapesia is a rejected name, against Mollisia, as indicated in the Appendix III of Shenzhen Code.
As a consequence, all validly published names in Tapesia should be combined in Mollisia, except if such combination already exists.
As Tapesia cinerella Rehm does not share the same type of Mollisia cinerella Sacc., a new name is required to combine it in Mollisia.
Tapesia is a rejected name, against Mollisia, as indicated in the Appendix III of Shenzhen Code.
As a consequence, all validly published names in Tapesia should be combined in Mollisia, except if such combination already exists.
As Tapesia cinerella Rehm does not share the same type of Mollisia cinerella Sacc., a new name is required to combine it in Mollisia.
Chris Yeates,
07-02-2022 16:54
Re : Tapesia
Un grand merci Nicolas
C'est exactement comme ça que j'ai interprété la situation.
Amitiés,Chris
Hans-Otto Baral,
07-02-2022 22:37
Re : Tapesia
Yes, some new combinations would be necessary. The only thing is whether the species in question is a good one or perhaps only a synonym of another. Many such synonymies are still to be discovered, and Mollisia with its high species diversity is a good example, either between teleomorphs or between teleomorphs and an anamorph that might have priority.