13-01-2021 22:05
Marja PennanenHello forum, I found some tiny black and setose o
06-01-2021 18:55
Aouali SouhilaHi,Happy New Year to everyone. I need advice on th
13-01-2021 19:14
Edvin Johannesen
I though I'd just ask you about this tiny discomyc
22-12-2020 21:20
Robin Isaksson
Someone have a clue what this is? Spores 13-16x
09-01-2021 16:21
Lothar Krieglsteiner
.. collected 14.2.20, Southern Germany, Baden-Wuer
12-01-2021 06:29
Khomenko Igor
Hi,I found this discomycete in two instances in Se
11-01-2021 20:41
Maria Plekkenpol
Hello, first of all I wish everyone a healthy and
Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
09-01-2021 16:42
.. collected 8.6.20, Germany, Bavaria, Neuburg a.d. Donau, "Kreut", on Mentha longifolia. I think almost everything fits with T. sulphurea (that grows (only?) on Urtica), including the hemiamyloid pore, with the exception of the small spores - I measured them 23-33/+-3 µm.
Is this too small or can it still be accepted for sulphurea?
Best regards, Lothar
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2021 17:18
Re : Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
Hi Lothar
in my foles this is the perfect spores size of sulphurea = nylanderi: I have in my folder name 18-39 x 2,5-3,5(-4).
The asci are withou croziers?
I had the spacies once on Impatiens gland. and Francois valade on Phytolacca.
Zotto
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
09-01-2021 17:28
Re : Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
thank you, Zotto!
I have looked in an older key of yours, where the measures are larger.
I must more look in your folders, in future ...
So everything is o.k.
Best regards, Lothar
P.S. I fear I did not look for the croziers ...
I have looked in an older key of yours, where the measures are larger.
I must more look in your folders, in future ...
So everything is o.k.
Best regards, Lothar
P.S. I fear I did not look for the croziers ...
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2021 17:31
Re : Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
I can't find larger measurements, only the width may go to *3-3.8(-4).
But you are right, my old key says 33-38/2,5-3,5 µm, so neglects shorter spores.