16-07-2025 17:34
Bernard Declercq
Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention
14-07-2025 11:20
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Voici une espèce de (?) Hyaloscyphace
16-01-2023 21:31
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on
14-07-2025 17:55
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de
14-07-2025 11:17
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest
14-07-2025 15:52
Gernot FriebesHi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae
14-07-2025 13:37
Gernot FriebesHi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari
Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
Juuso Äikäs,
24-05-2020 17:54
Using Huhtinen's 1989 key this is the best fit I got but would appreciate a second opinion.
The apos are up to 0.4mm wide. Asci arising from croziers, ascus pores amyloid.
Spore measurements: 7.7-9.4 × 2.5-2.9 µm (N = 5).
Hans-Otto Baral,
24-05-2020 20:21
Re : Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
A second opinion could be H. fuckelii var. fuckelii. By memory I know albohylalina with larger spores with larger guttules.
Juuso Äikäs,
24-05-2020 20:31
Re : Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
Yeah, the spores cast a doubt. They didn't have much oil and are a bit small but would fit in the range. And there weren't many of them (maybe a bit unripe?). Fuckelii max. width was about 2.5 microns and would have a low oil content if I remeber correctly. Maybe I'll try to find more spores and this would be clearer.
Hans-Otto Baral,
24-05-2020 21:20
Re : Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
my memory is not fully sure if Huhtinen uses living in his key or dead spores which are smaller.