09-12-2025 12:06
Andgelo Mombert
Bonjour,Je recherche l'article concernant Hypobryo
07-12-2025 16:07
Arnold BüschlenHallo, ich habe in einer Moos-Aufsammlung (epiphy
08-12-2025 21:04
Mark Stevens"Hello everyone,I'm relatively new to microscopy (
08-12-2025 18:59
Lothar Krieglsteiner
.. found by a seminar-participant, I do not know t
08-12-2025 17:37
Lothar Krieglsteiner
20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened
16-03-2014 22:00
Ralph Vandiest
Hello,I found this species a few months ago but ha
08-12-2025 13:39
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10572899
Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
Juuso Äikäs,
24-05-2020 17:54
Using Huhtinen's 1989 key this is the best fit I got but would appreciate a second opinion.
The apos are up to 0.4mm wide. Asci arising from croziers, ascus pores amyloid.
Spore measurements: 7.7-9.4 × 2.5-2.9 µm (N = 5).
Hans-Otto Baral,
24-05-2020 20:21
Re : Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
A second opinion could be H. fuckelii var. fuckelii. By memory I know albohylalina with larger spores with larger guttules.
Juuso Äikäs,
24-05-2020 20:31
Re : Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
Yeah, the spores cast a doubt. They didn't have much oil and are a bit small but would fit in the range. And there weren't many of them (maybe a bit unripe?). Fuckelii max. width was about 2.5 microns and would have a low oil content if I remeber correctly. Maybe I'll try to find more spores and this would be clearer.
Hans-Otto Baral,
24-05-2020 21:20
Re : Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
my memory is not fully sure if Huhtinen uses living in his key or dead spores which are smaller.