Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

18-07-2025 23:03

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.Fruitings between 51 and 130 microns in tota

17-07-2025 11:55

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

De ayer en bosque de hayas y abetos, en tieraEjemp

16-07-2025 17:34

Bernard Declercq Bernard Declercq

Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention

14-07-2025 11:20

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Voici une espèce de  (?) Hyaloscyphace

15-07-2025 13:27

Angel Pintos Angel Pintos

Hello, does anyone have access to the following ar

16-01-2023 21:31

Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on

14-07-2025 17:55

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de

14-07-2025 11:17

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest

14-07-2025 15:52

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae

14-07-2025 13:37

Gernot Friebes

Hi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Psilachnum inquilinum?
Juuso Äikäs, 04-06-2020 00:44
These I found from a dead Equisetum stem in a moist groove in Picea abies dominated forest. While looking at them with a hand lens I thought they were Lachnums but the microscopy seems different. I think they were with croziers but am not sure. 

Spores: 
(7.1) 7.7 - 9.2 (9.3) × (1.9) 2.1 - 2.5 (2.6) µm
Q = (3.1) 3.3 - 4.2 (4.4) ; N = 10
Me = 8.2 × 2.2 µm ; Qe = 3.7


  • message #63541
  • message #63541
  • message #63541
  • message #63541
  • message #63541
  • message #63541
Hans-Otto Baral, 04-06-2020 07:43
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Psilachnum inquilinum?
Yes. I think it is typical P. inquilinum. On E. hyemale exists a larger-spored species, but you seem to have have another substrate.
Juuso Äikäs, 04-06-2020 12:31
Re : Psilachnum inquilinum?
Thanks for the conformation and info, I'll have to keep that species in mind. The substrate was a rather small Equisetum. I googled E. hyemale and that one is apparently quite large and tough.