Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

06-03-2026 17:51

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening all,On March 4, 2026, I found the fol

05-03-2026 10:07

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello, I found and collected this species growing

06-03-2026 09:41

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

Hi forum, I'm now looking for another reference c

05-03-2026 19:29

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone,On March 4, 2026, I found th

05-03-2026 16:30

François Bartholomeeusen

Dear forum members, On the 2nd of February 2026,

19-02-2026 17:49

Salvador Emilio Jose

Hola buenas tardes!! Necesito ayuda para la ident

28-02-2026 11:05

Yanick BOULANGER

Bonjour à tousLe 24/02/2026 à Montmacq, devant m

03-03-2026 20:34

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good eveningThese small, amphora-shaped perithecia

28-02-2026 11:54

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

Hi forum,Is anyone aware if the 1936 edition of Si

02-03-2026 22:07

Jorge Hernanz

Buenas noches!Entre musgos, bajo Pinus halepensis

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Rutstroemia sp.
Perz Piotr, 23-02-2006 12:14
Salve!

I have found this Rutstroemia on [unidetified] petiole: http://wwkk.mikologia.pl/spec/20051015_001_PERZ/20051015_001_PERZ.php

What is strange? Strange is H2O+IKI reaction on..... I do not know where :) It seems to be LB's in paraphyses reaction, or interhymenial gel (A.Gminder) ?? Something is here amyloid!
Rutstroemia sydowiana HAS NOT this reaction (H2O+IKI), may be Rutstroemia petiolorum, but i do not have this spec. in my herbarium and i can not test this reaction.

What do you think - is this a contaminant in hymenium or this taxon does have amyloid LB's in paraphyses OR interhymenial gel ?

Has anyone R.petiolorum and can make test for me? Or may be do you know this spec.?

Best,
Pimpek
Hans-Otto Baral, 23-03-2006 18:26
Hans-Otto Baral
Re:Rutstroemia sp.
The Rutstroemia is very interesting, I think it is conspecific with R. "kalevi" on the DVD. This name is unpublished, it was intended to be published by J.T. Palmer and myself long ago. The substrate looks for me as an Acer petiole, and that´s also the substrate of the two earlier finds.

I found the ectal excipulum to be heavily gelatinized! No t. prismatica but strong oblita, see below. But it´s interesting: the find made by Lothar Krieglsteiner I saw fresh and I saw only scarcely any gel in the (living) excipulum, whereas in the find from Estonia the excipulum is heavily gelatinized. You write you have only one fruitbody, but I see two on your drawing. Do you still have one? Please have another look at the excipulum.

The species is surely close to R. coracina, but that is on Quercus leaves in the mediterranean area and has broader spores and brown vacuoles in the living paraphyses. Typical for both is the brown crenulate margin.

What I´m surprized from your drawing are the multiguttulate paraphyses. Such guttulation is very very typical of R. luteovirescens (which also grows on stromatized Acer leaves). But that species has yelow apothecia and really a textura prismatica without gel! R. kalevi has Mollisia-like vacuoles in the paraphyses. I presume that the guttules you saw in the dead material are secondary, maybe induced by the iodine. By the way I saw only the apical rings to react blue in IKI, and I am sure that you saw the blue rings of the old emptied and collapsed asci among the paraphyses and were misled to believe that the latter were amyloid.

  • message #681