25-01-2026 23:23
Hello! I found this species that resembles Delitsc
05-02-2026 15:07
Found on a fallen needle of Pinus halepensis, diam
05-02-2026 06:43
Stefan BlaserHello everybody, Any help on this one would be mu
18-08-2025 15:07
Lothar Krieglsteiner
.. 20.7.25, in subarctic habital. The liverwort i
02-02-2026 21:46
Margot en Geert VullingsOn a barkless poplar branch, we found hairy discs
02-02-2026 14:55
Andgelo Mombert
Bonjour,Sur thalle de Lobaria pulmonaria.Conidiome
02-02-2026 14:33
Andgelo Mombert
Bonjour,Sur le thalle de Peltigera praetextata, ne
31-01-2026 10:22
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Cette hypocreale parasite en nombre les
Orbilia sp 11-05-19
Blasco Rafael,
19-05-2019 18:41
Hola, que les parece esta Orbilia no se con cual comparar.Sobre madera sp, de Ribera, Salix, fraxinus, betula, corylus
Diametro hasta 1 mm
Ascas entre 55--70 x 4,5--6
Esporas 6--8,5 x 1,4--2 (9,5x2,3)
conidio estrellado
Despues de varias preparaciones no consigo ver laas esporas en condiciones idoneas, si es necesario continuare intentandolo
Un saludo Rafael
Hans-Otto Baral,
19-05-2019 20:24
Re : Orbilia sp 11-05-19
I cannot say, the resolution ist not enough. Somewhat it resembles O. aprilis but I feel the asci are thin-walled above and will turn truncate when dead. Also the paraphyses seem to be capitate.
Did you observe the shaoe of the spore bodies?
The conidium would fit O. aprilis.
Zotto
Did you observe the shaoe of the spore bodies?
The conidium would fit O. aprilis.
Zotto
Blasco Rafael,
20-05-2019 08:24
Hans-Otto Baral,
20-05-2019 09:52
Re : Orbilia sp 11-05-19
Woww! Now it is 5x better. Orbilia trapeziformis.
But the spores should be wider than 1.5 µm. These are the measurements from 50 collections:
*(5–)6.5–9.5(–11) × (2–)2.2–2.8(–3.2) µm
in dead state †6–9(–9.5) × 1.8–2.7 µm
Since your ascus measurements concur with mine:
*(45–)50–75(–80) × (4.4–)4.8–6(–7)((–7.5)) µm
I assume your spores are wider (9.5 x 2.3 is a good value).
But the spores should be wider than 1.5 µm. These are the measurements from 50 collections:
*(5–)6.5–9.5(–11) × (2–)2.2–2.8(–3.2) µm
in dead state †6–9(–9.5) × 1.8–2.7 µm
Since your ascus measurements concur with mine:
*(45–)50–75(–80) × (4.4–)4.8–6(–7)((–7.5)) µm
I assume your spores are wider (9.5 x 2.3 is a good value).
Blasco Rafael,
20-05-2019 10:03
Re : Orbilia sp 11-05-19
Gracias Zotto, el grueos no lo he anotado por que creia que queria ver la forma,
las medidas varian mucho dependiendo de la posicion de la espora, en estas medicion estan entre 2 y 2,5, no he medido ninguna que llegara a 3
Un saludo Rafael
las medidas varian mucho dependiendo de la posicion de la espora, en estas medicion estan entre 2 y 2,5, no he medido ninguna que llegara a 3
Un saludo Rafael
Hans-Otto Baral,
20-05-2019 10:42
Re : Orbilia sp 11-05-19
Could you please check the pores of the wood, is the branch ring-pored (Fraxinus) or are the pores in radial rows (Corylus, Betula)?
Tell me the collection data please.
Tell me the collection data please.
Blasco Rafael,
20-05-2019 11:28






























