23-04-2024 21:49
Ethan CrensonHello all, A friend recently found this orange as
23-04-2024 15:18
Lothar Krieglsteiner... but likely a basidiomycete. I hope it is o.k.
22-04-2024 11:52
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)Hello,I made a loan of a collection of Microstoma
23-04-2024 13:17
Edouard EvangelistiBonjour à tous, Je viens de récolter ce que je
11-01-2022 16:36
Jason KarakehianHi does anyone have a digital copy of Raitviir A (
22-04-2024 20:38
Miguel Ángel RibesGood afternoon.Does anyone know this anamorph?It g
19-04-2024 14:28
B ShelbourneCudoniella tenuispora: Distinctive macro and habit
20-04-2024 16:02
Michel HairaudBonjour,On me fait part, pour diffusion d une list
Hyaloscypha aureliella / britannica
Patrice TANCHAUD,
20-02-2019 08:22
Sur épicéa. Spores 7,5-10 x 2,5-3 µm.
Merci d'avance pour vos avis.
Patrice
Kosonen Timo,
20-02-2019 08:32
Re : Hyaloscypha aureliella / britannica
Hello,
Let's start with the ecology: Softwood/hardwood - can you confirm? Ascus base needs to be checked also. And then a MLZ mount of the excipular cells. ...could be, or could be something totally else :-)
Timo
Patrice TANCHAUD,
20-02-2019 08:56
Re : Hyaloscypha aureliella / britannica
Epicéa = Picea Abies.
I will put new pictures tonight.
Kosonen Timo,
20-02-2019 09:35
Re : Hyaloscypha aureliella / britannica
Ah, of course, sloppy me.
H. britannica is supposed to have atleast some septate spores (10-20 %). Also there should be some spores clearly over 10 um in length if it was britannica. And take a careful look at the hairs: How resistent hair resin is in MLZ, does it dissolve immediately or is it still there. They both have crozier, check that also. It's not always easy, you could try congo red just to check the ascus base.
T
Patrice TANCHAUD,
22-02-2019 09:14
Kosonen Timo,
22-02-2019 10:00
Re : Hyaloscypha aureliella / britannica
okay!
H. aureliella & conifer. Just as in maybe 98% of the cases.
Never seen H. britannica here in Scandinavia. Stip Helleman has collected H. britannica and he considered it as very rear and not a boreal species. But it is definately a good species (sequences & morphology). Keep your eyes open :-).
Timo
Patrice TANCHAUD,
22-02-2019 10:25
Re : Hyaloscypha aureliella / britannica
Thanks for all.
Patrice
Patrice