18-08-2025 15:07
Lothar Krieglsteiner
.. 20.7.25, in subarctic habital. The liverwort i
02-02-2026 21:46
Margot en Geert VullingsOn a barkless poplar branch, we found hairy discs
02-02-2026 14:55
Andgelo Mombert
Bonjour,Sur thalle de Lobaria pulmonaria.Conidiome
02-02-2026 14:33
Andgelo Mombert
Bonjour,Sur le thalle de Peltigera praetextata, ne
31-01-2026 10:22
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Cette hypocreale parasite en nombre les
02-02-2026 09:29
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pour cette récolte de 2
01-02-2026 19:29
Nicolas Suberbielle
Bonjour, Marie-Rose D'Angelo (Société Mycologiq
31-01-2026 09:17
Marc Detollenaere
Dear Forum,On decorticated wood of Castanea,I foun
29-08-2025 05:16
Francois Guay
I think I may have found the teleomorph of Dendros
Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
Björn Wergen,
29-03-2014 00:06
Hi friends,I have received a collection from Switzerland, a small pyrenomycete growing on dead stems of Aruncus dioicus. I first thought about Leptosphaerulina, but the features have given me another direction. I think the apical apparatus reacts rb in iodine (I have seen blue-gray and red ones). This means probably Xylariales, but which one has so small fruitbodies (170-210x45-50µm!) and muriforme spores of 12-16x3-5,5µm? I have no idea, but probably anyone can say something about it.
Best wishes,
björn
Hans-Otto Baral,
29-03-2014 08:25
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
Hi Björn
you could verify hemiamyloidity by KOH-pretreatment. It is very rare that a pyrenomycete is hemiamyloid and I am interested in any such case.
Zotto
you could verify hemiamyloidity by KOH-pretreatment. It is very rare that a pyrenomycete is hemiamyloid and I am interested in any such case.
Zotto
Björn Wergen,
29-03-2014 08:34
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
Hi Zotto,
I am sure it does, because I have seen many asci with these colours (red and blue).
With KOH pretreatment they all would be blue, right?
regards,
björn
I am sure it does, because I have seen many asci with these colours (red and blue).
With KOH pretreatment they all would be blue, right?
regards,
björn
Hans-Otto Baral,
29-03-2014 08:44
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
Yes, intensely blue and no red at all!
Björn Wergen,
29-03-2014 09:00
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
Like this? Cool, isn't it? :P
Eric Strittmatter,
30-03-2014 08:40
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
Hi Björn and Zotto,
reminds me a bit of this one: http://www.landesmuseum.at/pdf_frei_remote/Sydowia_10_0197-0200.pdf
Eric
reminds me a bit of this one: http://www.landesmuseum.at/pdf_frei_remote/Sydowia_10_0197-0200.pdf
Eric
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-03-2014 10:37
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
A nice idea indeed! And Emil Müller overlooked the amyloidity of the bitunicate asci because he used Melzer without KOH.
Björn Wergen,
30-03-2014 11:12
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
Hi Eric,
I am to slow at all, I was preparing these old Sydowia-articles to include them into my literature system in a few days, so I probably would have thought about the same idea, which is great indeed. I was just thinking about Leptopeltidaceae and those strange fungi with flat fruitbodies, covered completely by epidermis layers. But the IKI reaction is totally wrong here, isn't it? That would not fit at all, Dothideomycetes aren't IKI+ like this, never never :P
I think the determination is right, Dothiopeltis arunci. But they should change its systematic position. Thanks to Eric for this.
PS. The first preparation was in Melzer, because I wanted to have the spores being dead due to the visibility of the septations. The apical reaction was red/blue already.
regards,
björn
I am to slow at all, I was preparing these old Sydowia-articles to include them into my literature system in a few days, so I probably would have thought about the same idea, which is great indeed. I was just thinking about Leptopeltidaceae and those strange fungi with flat fruitbodies, covered completely by epidermis layers. But the IKI reaction is totally wrong here, isn't it? That would not fit at all, Dothideomycetes aren't IKI+ like this, never never :P
I think the determination is right, Dothiopeltis arunci. But they should change its systematic position. Thanks to Eric for this.
PS. The first preparation was in Melzer, because I wanted to have the spores being dead due to the visibility of the septations. The apical reaction was red/blue already.
regards,
björn
Björn Wergen,
30-03-2014 11:24
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
By the way, in the newest Sydowia there is an article about it:
Alfred Granmo, Geir Mathiassen A new species of Dothiopeltis from Norway 343- 348
Does anyone have this? I really would like to read what Granmo and Mathiassen write about this genus...
regards,
björn
Alfred Granmo, Geir Mathiassen A new species of Dothiopeltis from Norway 343- 348
Does anyone have this? I really would like to read what Granmo and Mathiassen write about this genus...
regards,
björn
Martin Bemmann,
30-03-2014 11:29
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-03-2014 11:35
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
And they say they used Lugol!
Hans-Otto Baral,
30-03-2014 11:35
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
And they say they used Lugol!
Gernot Friebes,
30-03-2014 11:52
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
But who knows if they tested the material of D. arunci in Lugol...maybe it'd be worth contacting the authors and ask them about this strange hemiamyloid fungus.
Best wishes
Gernot
Best wishes
Gernot
Martin Bemmann,
30-03-2014 11:58
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
Maybe someone has this paper:
Crivelli&Müller E., 1983: Dothiopeltis arunci and its anamorph ascomycetes. Botanica Helvetica: 33-38
Ah, it is also online: http://dx.doi.org/10.5169/seals-65231
again I don't see remarks on iodine reaction.
Edit: the DOI-link should work
Crivelli&Müller E., 1983: Dothiopeltis arunci and its anamorph ascomycetes. Botanica Helvetica: 33-38
Ah, it is also online: http://dx.doi.org/10.5169/seals-65231
again I don't see remarks on iodine reaction.
Edit: the DOI-link should work
Gernot Friebes,
30-03-2014 12:06
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
It's online: http://retro.seals.ch/digbib/view?rid=bhl-002:1983:93::39&id=&id2=&id3=
EDIT: Didn't see that Martin edited his post. :-)
EDIT: Didn't see that Martin edited his post. :-)
Björn Wergen,
30-03-2014 12:15
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
What are you talking about? Clicking on the link leads to an error :P
Ah, you both have copied a "=" too much...ok ^^
Ah, you both have copied a "=" too much...ok ^^
Gernot Friebes,
30-03-2014 12:23
Re : Another strange fungus on Aruncus dioicus
I attach the article as a pdf file.
bhl-002-1983-93-1-a-004-d-0001.pdf