26-03-2026 15:31
Ã…ke Widgren
Hello,I found this one in October last year, on r
27-03-2026 15:23
Gernot FriebesHi,this Trichopezizella deviates from typical T. b
25-03-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a dead b
27-03-2026 15:08
Gernot FriebesHi,I'm looking for help with this coelomycete on C
27-03-2026 10:47
Ã…ge OterhalsI have tentatively identified this Stictis to S. f
24-03-2026 21:37
Elisabeth StöckliBonsoir,Sur bois (tronc) très pourri de conifère
25-03-2026 22:23
Marc Detollenaere
Dear Forum,On a debarked stem of Tilia, we found s
24-03-2026 15:44
Ã…ge OterhalsI hope someone can confirm the name of this collec
Melanomma subdispersum
Alain GARDIENNET,
07-03-2013 07:58
Bonjour, Quelqu'un parmi vous connait-il bien Melanomma subdispersum ?
Does somebody well know Melanomma subdispersum ?
Ce champignon est donné usuellement sur Betula, mais a déjà été observé aussi sur Sorbus.
Les spores que je vous montre sont celles d'une récolte personnelle sur Sorbus aria. Elles mesurent 22-26 x 8-10 µm. Reconnaissez-vous Melanomma subdispersum ?
Alain
Björn Wergen,
07-03-2013 21:44
Re : Melanomma subdispersum
Hi Alain,
I need the macroscopical appearance to say something :)
The spores does not look like those from M. subdispersum, but from Hysterium pulicare.
You should also compare with my finding on Funghiparadise (M. subdispersum and H. pulicare).
regards,
björn
I need the macroscopical appearance to say something :)
The spores does not look like those from M. subdispersum, but from Hysterium pulicare.
You should also compare with my finding on Funghiparadise (M. subdispersum and H. pulicare).
regards,
björn
Alain GARDIENNET,
07-03-2013 21:55
Re : Melanomma subdispersum
Hi Bjorn,
It isn't Hysterium pulicare (that I have seen many dozen of times, indeed)Â . It's a Melanomma species, ascomata are subglobulose.
It's very probably M. subdispersum but I just would like the opinion of a body who has already worked it. The ascospores are perhaps slightly different, I don't know (and substrate is not Betula).
Thanks,
Alain Â
It isn't Hysterium pulicare (that I have seen many dozen of times, indeed)Â . It's a Melanomma species, ascomata are subglobulose.
It's very probably M. subdispersum but I just would like the opinion of a body who has already worked it. The ascospores are perhaps slightly different, I don't know (and substrate is not Betula).
Thanks,
Alain Â
Björn Wergen,
07-03-2013 23:43
Re : Melanomma subdispersum
Hi Alain,
compared with my finding on Betula, with only slightly 2-coloured spores, I do not think that your collection is M. subdispersum.
regards,
björn
compared with my finding on Betula, with only slightly 2-coloured spores, I do not think that your collection is M. subdispersum.
regards,
björn
Alain GARDIENNET,
08-03-2013 08:00
Re : Melanomma subdispersum
Hi Björn,
It was my opinion. I suppose that your ascospores are more constricted, especially at primary septum ?
It could be another species. But which one ?
Alain
It was my opinion. I suppose that your ascospores are more constricted, especially at primary septum ?
It could be another species. But which one ?
Alain
Yannick Mourgues,
15-03-2013 20:21
Re : Melanomma subdispersum
Salut Alain.
Comment est la structure de la paroi ?
Yannick
Comment est la structure de la paroi ?
Yannick