03-09-2025 21:59
Philippe PELLICIERLa Léchère, Col de la Madeleine, alt 1970m, au s
03-09-2025 12:44
Enrique Rubio
Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o
31-08-2025 19:41
Enrique Rubio
Hi to someone.I need to download this issue of Sve
02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903
31-08-2025 17:32
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Pas d'identité trouvée pour cette réc
01-09-2025 08:42
François CorhayUn ami, conservateur d'une RN en Belgique, m'a adr
31-08-2025 14:34
Thomas FlammerI have found a Rutstroemia on abt. 2000 m on Alnus
29-08-2025 19:04
Thomas FlammerSpores 21.2 - 26.2 x 8.3 - 11.3 µm - Q: 2.20 - 2.
Annulusmagnus?
Hans-Otto Baral,
28-08-2010 12:35
On a Fagus log lying in mud of pond, soc. Orbilia luteorubella (Tübingen). Sp. *16.5-21 x 6-6.7 µm. Asci with striking inamyloid apical ring.The log is flooded after heavy rain, and the mud permanently moist in drier times.
It reminds me of Annulusmagnus triseptatus but spores early turn brown.
Zotto
Hans-Otto Baral,
28-08-2010 12:36
Re:Annulusmagnus?
Micro
Gernot Friebes,
28-08-2010 12:59
Re:Annulusmagnus?
maybe Ascitendus austriacus. This species should have delicately striate spores.
Best wishes,
Gernot
Best wishes,
Gernot
Alain GARDIENNET,
28-08-2010 13:31
Re:Annulusmagnus?
I'm agree with Gernot.
Alain
Alain
Hans-Otto Baral,
28-08-2010 19:51
Re:Annulusmagnus?
Thanks, I never heard of that genus, nor Ascolacicola where it was first described. Is that only known from the type collection??? Incredible to believe.
The asci are with (dead) 130-140 x 9-10 µm a bit short (protologue: 160-200 x 8.5-10.5). The spores are smooth, in my opinion, but the protologue says nothing of a striation. In any case, this fits quite well!
Was the species redescribed later? I do not have Campbell + Shearer 2004. Nothing is said on the spore guttules, as usually.
Zotto
The asci are with (dead) 130-140 x 9-10 µm a bit short (protologue: 160-200 x 8.5-10.5). The spores are smooth, in my opinion, but the protologue says nothing of a striation. In any case, this fits quite well!
Was the species redescribed later? I do not have Campbell + Shearer 2004. Nothing is said on the spore guttules, as usually.
Zotto
Gernot Friebes,
28-08-2010 20:23
Re:Annulusmagnus?
here you can find Campbell & Shearer (2004):
http://www.mycologia.org/cgi/content/full/96/4/822
Best wishes,
Gernot
http://www.mycologia.org/cgi/content/full/96/4/822
Best wishes,
Gernot
Hans-Otto Baral,
28-08-2010 21:46
Re:Annulusmagnus?
I now found that the spores become partly distinctly longitudinally striate when I put them in Melzer! Thereby they shrink a bit from 6-6.7 to 5.6-6.5 µm. Here a pic in water (live)
Hans-Otto Baral,
28-08-2010 21:50
Re:Annulusmagnus?
Here in Melzer.
I did not yet read the Campbell article but I am surprized that they describe a new genus for every species... Has that any sense?
Zotto
I did not yet read the Campbell article but I am surprized that they describe a new genus for every species... Has that any sense?
Zotto
Guy Garcia,
29-08-2010 08:40
Re:Annulusmagnus?
Hi Zotto,
You can download the paper here
http://www.mycologia.org/cgi/reprint/96/4/822.pdf
Best, Guy
You can download the paper here
http://www.mycologia.org/cgi/reprint/96/4/822.pdf
Best, Guy