Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

05-03-2026 16:30

François Bartholomeeusen

Dear forum members, On the 2nd of February 2026,

06-03-2026 09:41

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

Hi forum, I'm now looking for another reference c

28-02-2026 11:05

Yanick BOULANGER

Bonjour à tousLe 24/02/2026 à Montmacq, devant m

06-03-2026 17:51

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening all,On March 4, 2026, I found the fol

05-03-2026 10:07

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello, I found and collected this species growing

05-03-2026 19:29

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone,On March 4, 2026, I found th

19-02-2026 17:49

Salvador Emilio Jose

Hola buenas tardes!! Necesito ayuda para la ident

03-03-2026 20:34

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good eveningThese small, amphora-shaped perithecia

28-02-2026 11:54

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

Hi forum,Is anyone aware if the 1936 edition of Si

02-03-2026 22:07

Jorge Hernanz

Buenas noches!Entre musgos, bajo Pinus halepensis

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Is this Diaporthe rudis?
François Bartholomeeusen, 05-03-2026 16:30
Dear forum members,

On the 2nd of February 2026, I found a 10 cm long twig covered with perithecia with strikingly long necks (up to 1.5 mm) on Hedera helix. Under the bark was a black stroma.
Perithecia were spherical, up to 440 µm in diameter, black with straight or slightly curved thread-like ostioles up to 1500 µm in length.
Inside the perithecia was a gelatinous content consisting of hundreds of asci (average: 48 x 6.8 µm; Q= 7.2).
Spores (average 12 x 3.1 µm Q = 3.9), usually with septum in the centre and two large droplets in each half.
The reaction of the apical ring in Lugol's or Baral's solution is difficult to determine; Congo red not tested.
While viewing one of the preparations, I found ellipsoidal light brown conidia with the following dimensions: 3.6 x 2.1 µm, no conidiophores found.
Using the key mentioned in the publication by L.E. Wehmeyer(*), I identify the ascomata as D. medusaea (according to Mycobank: current name D. rudis).
This raises two questions:

1. Is Diaporthe rudis correct?
2. Is there a connection with the conidia?


Many thanks in advance,


François Bartholomeeusen


(*)Wehmeyer, L.E. (1933) The British species of the genus Diaporthe Nits. and its segregates. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 17: 237-295D. medusaea


 

  • message #84725
  • message #84725
  • message #84725
Mathias Hass, 07-03-2026 08:48
Mathias Hass
Re : Is this Diaporthe rudis?
It is for sure a Diaporthe sp. Ellis&Ellis Microfungi on Land Plants has two species on Hedera (so does Wehmeyer), namely D.pulla and D.hederae. Bladmineerder.nl has a D.helicis in addition to the former two. D. rudis is a taxon with a broad host spectrum, but it seems not to be mentioned on Hedera. In many (or most) cases it is not possible to distinguish Diaporthe species on basis of morphology. Based on Ellis&Ellis your find seem to be D.pulla which has more slender spores compared to D. hederae.

The observed conidia are not from Diaporthe/Phomopsis.

cheers Mathias