Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

13-07-2020 13:57

Tatraea dumbirensis?
Stefan Jakobsson

Here a 5 mm wide fungus growing on a decidious(?)

13-07-2020 12:08

Pulviluna miltina possible?
Juuso Äikäs

Yesterday I found some Pulvinulas growing on clay-

13-07-2020 13:17

Orbilia flagellispora (posible)
Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, a ver si me pueden ayudar con esta muestra d

07-07-2020 13:34

Peziza sp.
Sergey Markov

I found this peziza sp. on loamy soil - on the gro

12-07-2020 16:30

Pezoloma "herbacea"
Gilbert MOYNE

Bonjour, Une récolte qui me pose quelques problÃ

13-07-2020 12:06

Anthostomella ?
Garcia Susana

Hola, Me gustaría saber vuestra opinión acerca

12-07-2020 17:42

Brown Mollisia on grass
Juuso Äikäs

I found a lot of these growing gregariously on dea

12-07-2020 21:17

Octospora (?) dans une ornière argileuse humide
BERNARD CLESSE BERNARD CLESSE

Bonsoir à toutes et à tous,Que pensez-vous de ce

12-07-2020 19:23

Lophiostoma sur bois immergé
Andgelo Mombert Andgelo Mombert

Bonsoir, Sur bois mort décortiqué, immergé dan

09-07-2020 00:39

Stamnaria sp (Equisetum ramosissimum) Ascos amiloides
Valencia Lopez Francisco Javier

Hola a todosEncontré este curioso ascomycete a me

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Diatrypella tocciaeana
Enrique Rubio, 06-01-2010 18:49
Enrique RubioDear friends:
Is Diatrypella tocciaeana on Alnus bark a good species actually? I can see that the Index Fungorum sinonimize it with D. favacea, but I believe to see very differences with it.
Mny thanks¡
Enrique
Enrique Rubio, 06-01-2010 19:27
Enrique Rubio
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
My collection on Alnus glutinosa bark
  • message #9987
Enrique Rubio, 06-01-2010 19:27
Enrique Rubio
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Spores longer than D. favacea
  • message #9988
Enrique Rubio, 06-01-2010 19:28
Enrique Rubio
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Asci polysporous
  • message #9989
Jacques Fournier, 06-01-2010 20:32
Jacques Fournier
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Enrique;
I agree it is troublesome but since Croxall revised the genus (1950) the situation did not evolve. Based on microscopic and cultural data he synonymized several taxa with D. favacea, regardless of differences in the morphology of stromata he considered related to the texture of host bark.
This should be reevaluated with modern tools but Diatrypaceae is not trendy!
But if you gather enough data supporting the splitting of D. favacea, things may change!
Best wishes,
Jacques
Enrique Rubio, 07-01-2010 17:09
Enrique Rubio
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Many thanks for your advices, Jacques.
The time will say some thing to us...
Enrique