13-01-2026 09:10
Danny Newman
Dasyscyphella chrysotexta on indet. decorticate ha
13-01-2026 08:49
Danny Newman
Coccomyces sp. on fallen Rhododendron leavesPretty
13-01-2026 08:43
Danny Newman
Tricladium varicosporioides on indet. decorticate
12-01-2026 22:02
Ethan CrensonHello all, I am hoping someone will have some ins
13-01-2026 07:57
Danny Newman
cf. Bombardia on indet. decorticate woodAppalachia
13-01-2026 07:51
Danny Newman
Atrocalyx sp. on indet. herbaceous stemAppalachian
13-01-2026 07:28
Danny Newman
Chlorociboria glauca on indet. decorticate logThe
13-01-2026 07:14
Danny Newman
Neodasyscypha cerina on indet decorticate logThe S
11-01-2026 20:35
Josep Torres
Hello.A very tiny pyrenomycete sprouting sparsely
12-01-2026 05:24
Danny Newman
Cyathicula coronata on Urtica dioicaCataloochee Di
Geoglossum sp.
Vasileios Kaounas,
30-12-2019 09:12
Found in forest with Pinus halepensis, near to Olea.
asci (186.9) 192.9 - 220.1 (235) × (16.6) 19.4 - 21.2 (23.6) µm
spores (103.3) 110.7 - 135.7 (136.2) × (11.6) 12.9 - 13.4 (13.7) µm
5775-0001.pdf
Jacky Launoy,
30-12-2019 09:43
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Try Geoglossum fallax. If not look if the ascus is amyloid or hemiamyloid
Luc Lenaerts,
30-12-2019 14:47
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Hi,
I think it's Geoglossum cookeanum, because of the 7-septate spores and the presence of much moniliform chaines in the parafyses. Difference with Geoglossum barlae sensu stricto with rotated, distorted and intertwined paraphyses and almost without clear moniliform chains in the paraphyses is sometimes difficult. In my opinion the spores here are not 110-135 µm long, but much smaller.
Kind regards
Luc Lenaerts
I think it's Geoglossum cookeanum, because of the 7-septate spores and the presence of much moniliform chaines in the parafyses. Difference with Geoglossum barlae sensu stricto with rotated, distorted and intertwined paraphyses and almost without clear moniliform chains in the paraphyses is sometimes difficult. In my opinion the spores here are not 110-135 µm long, but much smaller.
Kind regards
Luc Lenaerts
Sabino Arauzo,
30-12-2019 15:17
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Yes, Geoglossum cookeanum, the spore measures must be wrong.
Sabino.
Peter Püwert,
30-12-2019 15:25
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Hi,
I agree with Luc and Sabino.
Greetings Peter.
