05-04-2026 22:46
Lothar Krieglsteiner
on wood of Ceratonia, Algarve, 3.4.2026.The color
15-05-2026 13:33
Sylvie Le GoffBonjour à tousJe serais très reconnaissante enve
16-03-2011 14:31
roman vargas albertoHi. I would like some opinion about this Peziza
14-05-2026 05:36
Ethan CrensonHi all, I haven't paid much attention to Lachnu
10-05-2026 23:17
Andreas Gminder
Hello,today we found in a moist steep decidous for
11-05-2026 12:32
Bernard CLESSE
Pourriez-vous m'aider à identifier cette héloti
13-05-2026 15:26
François Freléchoux
Bonjour,Voici une récolte faite il y a quelques j
12-05-2026 15:41
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Dear Ascolovers, especially interested in Pezizale
13-05-2026 12:05
Thierry Blondelle
Bonjour à tous,J'aimerais avoir confirmation de c
28-04-2026 20:07
Lothar Krieglsteiner
... on twig in the air at standing Ceratonia siliq
I am trying to find out why one of the British fungal databases (FRDBI) has changed Scutellina cejpii to Micoscypha cejpii. It quotes Ceská Mykol. 39(4): 207 (1985) whereas S cejpii has Ceská Mykol. 25(2): 83 (1971 ). Does anyone have a copy of this publication in PDF?Thanks
Mal
all issues of Czech Mycology can be downloaded here:
http://www.czechmycology.org/czech-mycology-content.php#v39
In the article from 1985, Microscypha cejpii is presented as a new combination for Hyaloscypha cejpii.
Best regards, Zuzana
Thanks again.
Mal
I sent a message to the MB managers.
Mal
see T. Schumacher (1988): The Scutellinia Battle; The Lost, Missing and Dead. Mycotaxon 33, relevant pages here: http://www.cybertruffle.org.uk/cyberliber/59575/0033/0165.htm
In short, S. hirta in original (C.F.Schumacher's and Fries's) sense is probably a Geopora, deeply cupulate species with fasciculate hairs. Then there's S. hirta ss. Cooke and Le Gal, the latter selected a neotype and, based on her description, this taxon seems conspecific with S. cejpii. T.Schumacher considered S. hirta (ss. anyone) nomen ambiguum.
T.Schumacher didn't in either work (1979, 1988, 1990) cite the neotype in K among studied specimens. Yao and Spooner (1996, Notes on British species of Scutellinia. Mycol. Res. 100) studied the Cooke's collection in K (S. hirta neotype) and confirmed it's conspecificity with S. hirta ss. Le Gal. They also pointed out that C.F.Schumacher wrote orange-red hymenium for this species ("miniata [,] extus fusco hirta") and that therefore it cannot be a Geopora.
But interesting is, that although Fries (1822) wrote this species has color like Peziza (Caloscypha) fulgens and that C.F.Schumacher illustrated immature specimen (which Fries compares with Peziza (Trichophaea) hybrida, quite correctly for an immature Scutellinia), he also states that C.F.Schumacher's fungus is 3 lignes wide and high. If he used milimeters, it would look ok, but "3 lin." should be equal to 6,75 mm. If anyone has an explanation for this, I would very much like to learn it. Anyway, I wonder if it is at all possible to confirm conspecificity of S. hirta ss. Cooke with S. hirta ss. orig. + Fries's, when neither was illustrated and there is no orig. material available.
Viktorie
Schumacher: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/252660#page/430/mode/1up
Fries: http://bibdigital.rjb.csic.es/ing/Libro.php?Libro=958