
02-07-2025 18:45
Elisabeth StöckliBonsoir,Sur feuilles d'Osmunda regalis (Saulaie),

02-07-2025 17:26
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourRécolté sur une brindille au fond d'un fo

02-07-2025 09:32

Hello, bonjour.Here is the paper I'm searching for

30-06-2025 16:56
Lydia KoelmansPlease can anyone tell me the species name of the

01-07-2025 23:37
Hello.A Pleosporal symbiotic organism located and

30-06-2025 12:09

This tiny, rather "rough" erumpent asco was found

30-06-2025 06:57
Ethan CrensonHi all, Another find by a friend yesterday in Bro

30-06-2025 14:45

This is a quite common species on Nothofagus wood

25-06-2025 16:56
Philippe PELLICIERBonjour, pensez-vous que S. ceijpii soit le nom co
gain
This Scutellinia was collected on an old fallen trunk of Quercus robur, somewhat in dry situation, not near to the soil. The hairs 350-1200 x 35-60 are multifurcate with a very broad base. So I think it could be Scutellinia olivascens (hairs fide Schumacher: 150-960 x 18-48).
The attached Cooke's plate seems to fit well with my collection
What do you think?
Many thanks again

Again it is difficult to determine with certainty; I would eliminate S.crinita, but I would hesitate with S.pilati which is also close to S.olivascens. The ornamentation of spores S.olivascens is less dense than S.pilati. The place also seems to correspond best to S.pilati for S.olivascens (humid places ).
Amitiés.
Michel.
Hi Michel
I think, as you, it is not crinita by the type of hairs. It could be S. pilatii but the ascospores 21-27 x 13-16 (fide Schumacher), vs 20-22 x 12-15, seem to be somewhat different.
Thanks a lot
