30-04-2024 16:22
François BartholomeeusenDear forum members,On April 25 2024, I found one f
03-05-2024 18:04
Riet van OostenHello, Found by Laurens van der Linde on Rubus fr
01-05-2024 23:22
Ethan CrensonHi all, Found late last week in a New York City p
29-04-2024 21:32
Robin IsakssonHi! Found in Sweden. Ascomata with haris, se
01-05-2024 12:54
F. JAVIER BALDA JAUREGUIHello, everyone.An idea for this pyreno, I found u
30-04-2024 19:43
Gernot FriebesHi!We observed this hyphomycete growing between le
29-04-2024 21:51
Mathias HassHi everyone, Found on attached branches of top pa
Lachnellula calyciformis vs. Lachnellula mugonicola nom. prov.
Pavol Palo,
21-07-2015 21:59
Can you give me a hand with the determination Lachnellula of Pinus mugo ? The ascii are with croziers or with basal protuberances.
Palo
p.s. Is Lachnellula mugonicola nom. prov. a valid genus?
Hans-Otto Baral,
21-07-2015 22:46
Re : Lachnellula calyciformis vs. Lachnellula mugonicola nom. prov.
Hi Pavol
mugonicola is undescribed. Yes, it deviates from calyciformis by croziers. I think this species froms consistently croziers with perforation.
Do you also have a macrophoto? In which province did you collect it?
Zotto
mugonicola is undescribed. Yes, it deviates from calyciformis by croziers. I think this species froms consistently croziers with perforation.
Do you also have a macrophoto? In which province did you collect it?
Zotto
Pavol Palo,
21-07-2015 23:26
Re : Lachnellula calyciformis vs. Lachnellula mugonicola nom. prov.
Hi Zotto
Slovakia , High Tatras.
Pavol
p.s. macrophoto added tomorrow :-)
Slovakia , High Tatras.
Pavol
p.s. macrophoto added tomorrow :-)
Pavol Palo,
22-07-2015 11:47
Hans-Otto Baral,
22-07-2015 12:44
Re : Lachnellula calyciformis vs. Lachnellula mugonicola nom. prov.
Thanks! The presence of croziers is not very clearly seen on your photo, but when you have seen them it is o.k.
Zotto
Zotto
Pavol Palo,
22-07-2015 13:40
Hans-Otto Baral,
22-07-2015 17:08
Re : Lachnellula calyciformis vs. Lachnellula mugonicola nom. prov.
I am sorry, it is too unsharp.