29-12-2025 17:44
Isabelle CharissouBonjour,J'aimerais savoir si d'autres personnes au
29-12-2025 17:12
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à
12-11-2021 00:03
Lepista ZacariasHi everybody,A week ago in my fiels trip I noticed
29-12-2025 17:01
Gernot FriebesHi,I'm looking for help with this hyphomycete with
29-12-2025 08:30
Josep Torres
Hello.A tiny ascomycete sprouting under Juniperus
29-12-2025 10:15
Hulda Caroline HolteHello, I found and collected this propoloid ascom
29-12-2025 09:38
Oskari VirtanenHi,could anyone help me identify this, I suspect P
28-12-2025 12:08
Margot en Geert VullingsThis possible Karstenia was found on the bark of d
21-12-2025 21:32
Pol DebaenstHello, Garden, Burgweg 19, Veurne, BelgiumOn 10/1
Please, read the attached pdf.
Bryoscyphus-on-Conocephalum-conicum-0001.pdf
Hi Enrique, did you find crystals in the excipulum ?
Amitiés
Michel
what a wonderful collection!!! I don't think it is turbinatus. Why not conocephali? Surely, the spores are too narrow, but: 1. The apical ring in turbinatus is Calycina-type, conocephali is Hymenoscyphus-type. 2. The living paraphyses of B. turbinatus are eguttulate.
Conclusion: B. turbinatus is no Bryoscyphus at all. In fact, an unpublished phylotree by Marie Davy shows it to be with Arachnopeziza!
I think you have at least something very close to B. conocephali, and I am especially happy because this is the first time I see this species alive, which is the type of the genus.
Zotto
Hi MIchel and Zotto
No, Michel. I don't find crystals in the excipulum but I couldn't study well it because I have only two apothecia.
Really very interesting your advices, Zotto. I was thinking that is was not conocephali because the ascospores described by Kirk and Spooner are very polymorphic and broader.
Do you want my pics at higher resolution?
Many thanks to both