06-07-2020 11:16
Valencia Lopez Francisco JavierHola a tod@sHace unos días recolecte este hongo e
06-07-2020 17:11
Thomas Læssøesee: https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10
06-07-2020 16:40
Michel Delpont
Bonjour à tous. Sur crottes de chèvres deux exe
06-07-2020 14:11
Thomas LæssøeUnfortunately without a proper hymenium (overmatur
06-07-2020 12:55
Thomas Læssøesee: https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10
06-07-2020 05:51
Yulia LytvynenkoDear friends.Looking for a copy of the following w
05-07-2020 18:06
Castillo Joseba
Me mandan el material seco de Galicia, recolectado
05-07-2020 10:31
Castillo Joseba
me mandan el material de Galicia, recolectado en h
Please, read the attached pdf.
Bryoscyphus-on-Conocephalum-conicum-0001.pdf
Hi Enrique, did you find crystals in the excipulum ?
Amitiés
Michel
what a wonderful collection!!! I don't think it is turbinatus. Why not conocephali? Surely, the spores are too narrow, but: 1. The apical ring in turbinatus is Calycina-type, conocephali is Hymenoscyphus-type. 2. The living paraphyses of B. turbinatus are eguttulate.
Conclusion: B. turbinatus is no Bryoscyphus at all. In fact, an unpublished phylotree by Marie Davy shows it to be with Arachnopeziza!
I think you have at least something very close to B. conocephali, and I am especially happy because this is the first time I see this species alive, which is the type of the genus.
Zotto
Hi MIchel and Zotto
No, Michel. I don't find crystals in the excipulum but I couldn't study well it because I have only two apothecia.
Really very interesting your advices, Zotto. I was thinking that is was not conocephali because the ascospores described by Kirk and Spooner are very polymorphic and broader.
Do you want my pics at higher resolution?
Many thanks to both