18-10-2018 23:23
Johan MyhrerHave been struggeling with these for a while, foun
18-10-2018 23:55
Yaroslav Mieshkov
Hello,Does anyone has the following paper? Bertau
08-10-2018 14:51
Edvin Johannesen
I came across these dense mats of apothecia seated
18-10-2018 10:37
Bernard Declercq
Hello, Can anyone supply me following paper? PaÅ
17-10-2018 07:10
Ethan CrensonIn Northeastern North America. On the banks of a
15-10-2018 18:55
hannie wijersHello, I'd like some help if possibleIn Beilen I
16-10-2018 23:33
Valencia Lopez Francisco JavierHola a todos/asPeziza recolectada en el sur de Esp
03-10-2018 22:13
François BartholomeeusenGood evening forum members,Can this be Hyalorbilia
14-10-2018 19:25
Marja PennanenHi, on a Populus leaf among other things, I found
In the area of Telemark (southern Norway), at the touristic point of the Ravensjuv, we collected a Sclerotiniaceae on dead stems of Rubus chamaemorus (at least this was the only plant that could be regarded a possible substrate in the vicinity). So - I asked ant G and so I found the paper of Holst-Jensen & Schumacher. And - what a luck - there was a species that seems to fit perfectly: the spores with the two quite large polar drops as contents that also have the right size, the habit and the substrate, the excipulum of globulosa. Everything o.k. - But: I did the IKI-reaction and obtained deeply blue pori. Holst-Jensen & Schumacher, however, describe the pori as iodine-negative.
Who knows C. latipes and also has obtained blue pori?
Regards from Lothar
never saw this interesting species or photos of it. In only know Nina's pretty photos of Rutatroemia cf. chamaemori, which has much longer curved spores like R. echinophila. But typical R. chamaemori has spores similar as yours, though longer.
I assume you checked the excipulum of globulosa? Did you measure more spores?
There is a further mismatch in the protologue: How can a species be named latipes when it could better be called filipes or the like? I guess the stipe is max. 0.5 mm wide, not 0.7-2 mm. There must be some confusion, or?
Lothar, falls du eine pdf hast dann schicke mir sie doch (hab nur eine Papierkopei). Falls du Holm & Holm 1977 fungi on Rubus chamaemorus nicht hast, den schicke ich dir gerne.
Seid ihr wohl schon wieder zurück?
Zotto
Hi Zotto,
yes, the excipulum is globulosa, the asci have croziers. I did not measure more spores by now, but can do this still with my fotos.
Den Aufsatz habe ich mir im Internet herunter geladen (Research Gate), aber das Speichern funktioniert nicht richtig (Text ist dann verzerrt und unlesbar). So kann ich Dir das leider nicht zusenden, aber Du solltest es selbst ergoogeln können.
Holm & Holm habe ich nicht - würde ich gerne haben ;-)
Yes, we returned Monday. There were not many fungi growing - it was still early spring in Scandinavia! (most common fungus was Gyromitra esculenta).
Kind regards and thanks!
Lothar