15-12-2025 07:09
Danny Newman
indet. Rutstroemiaceae sp. on unk. fallen leavesMc
15-12-2025 11:49
Danny Newman
ITS sequences from the following two collections B
15-12-2025 07:05
Danny Newman
Pseudosclerococcum golindoi (det: Zotto)near Cosb
09-12-2025 12:06
Andgelo Mombert
Bonjour,Je recherche l'article concernant Hypobryo
12-12-2025 18:39
Mirek GrycHello everyone.Macrofeatures similar to Mollisia b
07-12-2025 16:07
Arnold BüschlenHallo, ich habe in einer Moos-Aufsammlung (epiphy
08-12-2025 21:04
Mark Stevens"Hello everyone,I'm relatively new to microscopy (
08-12-2025 18:59
Lothar Krieglsteiner
.. found by a seminar-participant, I do not know t
Hi again Chris
Perhaps you have this other ?
Transactions of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh Volume 41, Issue 2, 1971. Some new records of ascomycetes from Scotland J.C. Krug.
I have a collection of a Sporormiella aff. borealis with smaller ascospores. 72-88 x 16 -22 and I'm looking for the variability of this species.
Thanks again
Are you sure you don't have S. megalospora ?
Chris
I think my collection does not belong to megalospora bcause the second cell of the ascospore is broader and the fragment are not easily separable. Only the ascospore size, smaller, does not fit with borealis.
What do you think?
Doc1-0009.pdf
As tu pensé à regarder du coté de Sporormiella sp. dont parle F.Doveri dans son livre! Le problème reste la taille des spores.
Michel.
Bonjour Michel
Je pense qu'elle est une autre espéce avec les espores de moindres dimensions qui se séparent avec facilité. Je crois que mon champi est plus prochain de borealis.
