31-08-2025 17:32
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Pas d'identité trouvée pour cette réc
31-08-2025 19:41
Enrique Rubio
Hi to someone.I need to download this issue of Sve
31-08-2025 14:34
Thomas FlammerI have found a Rutstroemia on abt. 2000 m on Alnus
29-08-2025 19:04
Thomas FlammerSpores 21.2 - 26.2 x 8.3 - 11.3 µm - Q: 2.20 - 2.
28-08-2025 17:24
Thomas FlammerI know, that this is not the real topic of this fo
29-08-2025 05:16
Francois Guay
I think I may have found the teleomorph of Dendros
27-08-2025 12:02
Pavol PaloHello dear friendsI would like to ask for sharing
25-08-2025 17:37
François Freléchoux
Bonjour,Nous avons trouvé samedi dernier à l'ét
Hi again Chris
Perhaps you have this other ?
Transactions of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh Volume 41, Issue 2, 1971. Some new records of ascomycetes from Scotland J.C. Krug.
I have a collection of a Sporormiella aff. borealis with smaller ascospores. 72-88 x 16 -22 and I'm looking for the variability of this species.
Thanks again
Are you sure you don't have S. megalospora ?
Chris
I think my collection does not belong to megalospora bcause the second cell of the ascospore is broader and the fragment are not easily separable. Only the ascospore size, smaller, does not fit with borealis.
What do you think?
Doc1-0009.pdf
As tu pensé à regarder du coté de Sporormiella sp. dont parle F.Doveri dans son livre! Le problème reste la taille des spores.
Michel.
Bonjour Michel
Je pense qu'elle est une autre espéce avec les espores de moindres dimensions qui se séparent avec facilité. Je crois que mon champi est plus prochain de borealis.
